Knies: 99% goneMost likely the top line jumps to the NHL after the season is over and so will our top two D.
I wonder if they don't get the title, would they come back for another try? Not sure what they are getting in NIL...Most likely the top line jumps to the NHL after the season is over and so will our top two D.
Knies and Cooley are gone.I wonder if they don't get the title, would they come back for another try? Not sure what they are getting in NIL...
Caufield stayed for 2 years. Is Cooley a better prospect or much more needed by the Coyotes than Caufield was Montreal? I think it's more like 50-50 for Cooley.Knies and Cooley are gone.
Yes, and yes... It's not 50/50.Caufield stayed for 2 years. Is Cooley a better prospect or much more needed by the Coyotes than Caufield was Montreal? I think it's more like 50-50 for Cooley.
I came here to ask the exact same thing.Anyone know what the scenarios are for us to maintain #1 in the PWR? Looking at RPI it would seem like Quinnipiac is the only team who could reasonably catch us, but I won't pretend to know all of the math involved.
I'll be the first to admit that I'm no expert of pairwise. Part of the challenge is not just how MN plays in their next 3 or (hopefully) 4 games, but how Quinnipiac (and other schools) play as well. The linked chart summarizes some 20,000 simulations for the remainder of the season. It appears that 68% of the time the Gophers stay at #1, 31% of the time they slip to #2 - which almost assures them of a 1 or 2 seed some 99% of the time. This chart was updated through last nights games. https://www.collegehockeynews.com/ratings/probabilityMatrix.phpI came here to ask the exact same thing.
For example, if they split with OSU and lost in the semis would they fall out of 1st?
That confuses me because didn’t we actually expand on our RPI lead over Q this weekend? What factors would have changed things for the worse?Before this weekend that 68% was 75%
Maybe? The frozen four is in St. Paul next year.I wonder if they don't get the title, would they come back for another try? Not sure what they are getting in NIL...
i think it's hard to say it that simply. I don't think it's as high as the 98% you quoted prior. the yotes are not even remotely close to contending. They have until 2026 to sign him. They're prospect pool is bad, as is their whole roster. I think if there's pressure for him to sign, it will come from Cooley rather than the other way around and it's hard to say how amped up he will be for a team that will suck. Wouldn't be at all surprised to have them want him to stay at MN for another year while they continue the rebuild and let him develop while having the chance to work on his defensive skills as well.Yes, and yes... It's not 50/50.
Interviews with Cooley have made it pretty clear he's trying to get to the NHL asap.i think it's hard to say it that simply. I don't think it's as high as the 98% you quoted prior. the yotes are not even remotely close to contending. They have until 2026 to sign him. They're prospect pool is bad, as is their whole roster. I think if there's pressure for him to sign, it will come from Cooley rather than the other way around and it's hard to say how amped up he will be for a team that will suck. Wouldn't be at all surprised to have them want him to stay at MN for another year while they continue the rebuild and let him develop while having the chance to work on his defensive skills as well.
Snuggerud I would put lower than 50/50 as can't see the Blues wanting him after they just unloaded the whole team for a rebuild.
Agree that Knies is all but gone. Would imagine the same for all the D you listed.
like I said, I think it depends on what they're doing. I'd probably put it at about 75/25 he's gone. Track record would say he'd play 2 years and gone right at the end of Soph year based on what recent top flight picks have done. I don't think the Yotes will be in any hurry to start having his contract roll with them, and Cooley doesn't get much leverage until probably 2025 given how long they have his rights. Obviously if things change and they think they can contend or that he think he's ready to be their top line center (and that they're ready to spend big in the offseason), then that changes things. I just am not seeing it as that aggressive they want him to be there, even if he's hoping to start that clock.Interviews with Cooley have made it pretty clear he's trying to get to the NHL asap.
What? Later I'll pull it, but you will not see that for top 5 forwards, top 10 forwards, or even probably top 15 forwards. They've been mostly one and lately, especially if they put up points like Cooley. Don't count the extra years Michigan gets out of their guys before they are drafted.Track record would say he'd play 2 years and gone right at the end of Soph year based on what recent top flight picks have done.
The Michigan group from last year, Caulfield, Coranato, Sanderson l (I know you said forwards) all within the last couple years. I’d suspect Lucius would still be playing college if things had gone differently with the family situation. It all just depends on the circumstances they’re coming into. Just was trying to say it’s not as much an absolute given they jump after one year as it used to be. Track record probably not the right way to phrase that. Maybe the recency is all coming from the Covid situation. Maybe not.What? Later I'll pull it, but you will not see that for top 5 forwards, top 10 forwards, or even probably top 15 forwards. They've been mostly one and lately, especially if they put up points like Cooley. Don't count the extra years Michigan gets out of their guys before they are drafted.
You're not looking apples to apples. Michigan got a pre draft year out of them. Caulfield and Coronato were not top ten.The Michigan group from last year, Caulfield, Coranato, Sanderson l (I know you said forwards) all within the last couple years. I’d suspect Lucius would still be playing college if things had gone differently with the family situation. It all just depends on the circumstances they’re coming into. Just was trying to say it’s not as much an absolute given they jump after one year as it used to be. Track record probably not the right way to phrase that. Maybe the recency is all coming from the Covid situation. Maybe not.
If you’re only talking top ten, the sample size is then tiny. So yes sure then fine, that’s completely fair and you’re right as I’m thinking mostly of dmen who have stayed the extra yearYou're not looking apples to apples. Michigan got a pre draft year out of them. Caulfield and Coronato were not top ten.
Didn't Holloway do two years? Not disputing your overall point at all, I just thought he was in the same class as Caufield.Going back to 2016.
1-10 Forwards
Beniers - 2nd- One year post draft
Tkachuk - 4th - Zero years post draft
Turcotte - 5th - One year
Johnson - 5th- One year
Keller - 7th - One year
Mittelstadt - 8th - One year
Zegras - 9th - One year
Boucher - 10th - One year
11-20 Forwards
Wahlstrom - 11th - One year
Boldy - 12th - Two years
Coronato - 13th - Two years so far
Holloway - 14th - One year
Farabee - 14th - One year
Kunin - 15th - One year
Caufield - 15th - Two years
Newhook - 16th - Two years
Lucius - 18th - One year
Bellows - 19th - One year
Norris - 19th - Two years
O'Brien - 19th - Four years
Cooley is gone.
He did one year post draft. He came in early like Beniers/Johnson/Fantilli.Didn't Holloway do two years? Not disputing your overall point at all, I just thought he was in the same class as Caufield.
And a quick fact check shows I was wrong. He did play two years, but only one post-draft. My mistake.Didn't Holloway do two years? Not disputing your overall point at all, I just thought he was in the same class as Caufield.
Yep I caught myself just after you replied. Thanks for the correction.He did one year post draft. He came in early like Beniers/Johnson/Fantilli.
I believe he has had injury problems.Yep I caught myself just after you replied. Thanks for the correction.
off topic but I thought Holloway would have made more of an impact in the NHL by now. I was always impressed with him at UW.