If we fired Zim he would be at the top of every other team's list. That's a sign we're making a mistake. And we would replace him with who? Kubiak is not healthy enough to take over. Hiring random OC or DC X is a total crap-shoot.I've been as big of a proponent of Zimmer as anyone.
But at this point, what is the point? Zimmer is supposed to provide defense and toughness. He also talked big game about not making mistakes.
But now his team cant stop the run. They fumble the ball a ton. Give up big plays. Zimmer's defenses are supposed to be elite, and they have been mediocre.
Their offense is solid. But we dont need Zim for that.
MNF has been in a deep death spiral for a while now. It was bad last year when Witten was there. It's even worse now without him. And that's saying a lot.I’m not sure what’s worse, the Vikings or the announcers. We don’t need to hear everything Wilson says.
Also Seattle still doesn’t have a penalty called against them.
Disagree. It may not be great, but it's better than it was with Witten.MNF has been in a deep death spiral for a while now. It was bad last year when Witten was there. It's even worse now without him. And that's saying a lot.
Vikings defense is pretty mediocre this year. Hard to watch them get RUTM’d all the way down the field.I've been as big of a proponent of Zimmer as anyone.
But at this point, what is the point? Zimmer is supposed to provide defense and toughness. He also talked big game about not making mistakes.
But now his team cant stop the run. They fumble the ball a ton. Give up big plays. Zimmer's defenses are supposed to be elite, and they have been mediocre.
Their offense is solid. But we dont need Zim for that.
I loved the adjustments Zimmer made to Seattle using 6 offensive lineman?
Wait he didn't. How about 3 defensive tackles? Might have helped them from running it down our throats at the end.
It is awful. Booger, um, the Minneapolis Miracle was a catch. That's why they call it that.MNF has been in a deep death spiral for a while now. It was bad last year when Witten was there. It's even worse now without him. And that's saying a lot.
14 seconds, no time outs. They wouldn't have even gotten into hail mary range.Losing Cook probably didn’t help. Cousins gave Irv Smith a catchable ball. Timing/route wasn’t quite there.
Also, Seattle is really good and were playing at home. And it was a night game two time zones to the west. Also lost the starting left OT. All that and we still were in it.
Still even could’ve had a Hail Mary at the end. But our special teams f__ed us.
But there’s that chance the 6th lineman might go out for a pass!!!!!I loved the adjustments Zimmer made to Seattle using 6 offensive lineman?
Wait he didn't. How about 3 defensive tackles? Might have helped them from running it down our throats at the end.
Didn't the Broncos once have an 11-5 team that failed to make the playoffs, sometime in the 80's, maybe? Seems that was back when the league only had ~28 team and only 4 or so in each conference made the playoffs, though, so it was less surprising than it would be to have such happen now.per Shooter:
The Minnesota Vikings could finish 11-5 and not make the playoffs. The way it looks now, at the very least the Vikings probably have to win two of their last three games, and maybe all three, to get into the postseason.
If the Vikings (9-4) end up tied with the Rams (8-5) for the final NFC playoff spot, the Rams would win the tiebreaker because of a better record against common opponents.
Charley Walters: Vikings likely must win 2 of last 3 games for playoff berth
The Minnesota Vikings could finish 11-5 and not make the playoffs. The way it looks now, at the very least the Vikings probably have to win two of their last three games, and maybe all three, to ge…www.twincities.com
Skol Vikes!!
per Shooter:
The Minnesota Vikings could finish 11-5 and not make the playoffs. The way it looks now, at the very least the Vikings probably have to win two of their last three games, and maybe all three, to get into the postseason.
If the Vikings (9-4) end up tied with the Rams (8-5) for the final NFC playoff spot, the Rams would win the tiebreaker because of a better record against common opponents.
Charley Walters: Vikings likely must win 2 of last 3 games for playoff berth
The Minnesota Vikings could finish 11-5 and not make the playoffs. The way it looks now, at the very least the Vikings probably have to win two of their last three games, and maybe all three, to ge…www.twincities.com
Skol Vikes!!
That's not accurate. They have a 2-game lead in the loss column on games played within the division, so we have to hope for a Packers loss today against the Bears or in week 17 against the Lions. If they win both of those they win the division, and our game next week doesn't matter.Keep in mind that the Packers only have a game advantage over the Vikings right now and they have to come to Minneapolis still. We beat them and gain the tiebreaker.
That's not accurate. They have a 2-game lead in the loss column on games played within the division, so we have to hope for a Packers loss today against the Bears or in week 17 against the Lions. If they win both of those they win the division, and our game next week doesn't matter.
I don't recall that. The Patriots only missed the play-offs once in the Brady era. The year he got hurt, they went 10-6 but didn't make the play-offs. I don't recall any 11-5 teams missing.Didn't the Broncos once have an 11-5 team that failed to make the playoffs, sometime in the 80's, maybe? Seems that was back when the league only had ~28 team and only 4 or so in each conference made the playoffs, though, so it was less surprising than it would be to have such happen now.
The Patriots were 11-5 and missed the playoffs in 2008, the year Brady was hurt.I don't recall that. The Patriots only missed the play-offs once in the Brady era. The year he got hurt, they went 10-6 but didn't make the play-offs. I don't recall any 11-5 teams missing.
The week 17 Packers/Lions game is in Detroit not Green Bay.The results yesterday kind of took the juice out of the Packer game next week. We can only win the division if GB loses to Detroit at home in week 17. And the Rams might be eliminated on Sunday. So all we really have to play for is the #5 seed vs. the #6 seed.
Ah. OK. Increase the Lions odds from 2% to 5%.The week 17 Packers/Lions game is in Detroit not Green Bay.
I kind of like the lost juice in this case. Vikes can breathe a bit.The results yesterday kind of took the juice out of the Packer game next week. We can only win the division if GB loses to Detroit at home in week 17. And the Rams might be eliminated on Sunday. So all we really have to play for is the #5 seed vs. the #6 seed.
My biggest gripe with the NFL playoffs is that a division winner is automatically a top 4 seed. That's fine if they want to give a division winner an automatic spot but they should rank them 1-6 based on record. It's ridiculous that an 8-8 team could be hosting a 12-4 team. With just 4 teams, winning the division is not that hard in the NFL.The Patriots were 11-5 and missed the playoffs in 2008, the year Brady was hurt.
It's always been an issue, but this year will be really blatant. You wonder if the NFL won't look at revising it.My biggest gripe with the NFL playoffs is that a division winner is automatically a top 4 seed. That's fine if they want to give a division winner an automatic spot but they should rank them 1-6 based on record. It's ridiculous that an 8-8 team could be hosting a 12-4 team. With just 4 teams, winning the division is not that hard in the NFL.