Your a hot mess. Yesterday Purdue vs Auburn was only about Purdue vs Auburn and not indicative of the separation of the talent gap between the conferences. Now it’s not only Purdue vs Auburn but also Michigan vs Florida.
The more you ignore the facts, the more you undermine your credibility.
I don’t understand what you are arguing.
I have already said the SEC is stronger than the big ten. I’m just saying you can’t cherry pick games to say certain conference never have a chance.
Michigan has a terrible offense and a defense missing 4 guys and got their butts kicked.
Purdue was overmatched and I made money on the game.
Does this mean Ohio state couldn’t beat Georgia? No
Does this mean penn State can’t beat Kentucky? No
Does this mean Iowa can’t beat Mississippi State? No
In fact, Virginia crushed South Carolina. That doesn’t mean the middle of the ACC is better than the middle of the SEC.
Baylor beat Vanderbilt. That doesn’t mean the bottom of the big 12 is better than the bottom of the SEC.
SEC is clearly the number one conference in the top third for a number of year now.
Middle third of the conference i’d argue the big 12, big 10, and sec have all been best in the middle depending on the year.
Who really cares about the bottom third but Rutgers might be the worst major conference team.