Search results

I highly doubt the committee listened or cared whatever he said.

Agreed. Mo probably should have been in top 3. I love me some Mo but its a two man race between Corum and Robinson. They are on a next level than Mo.

Im not arguing for either direction, BUT those percentages can be deceiving. For example, if a team passes early in the game and is blowing the opponent out they will more than likely in the second half be running the ball a majority of the time to close out the game. Would be interesting to...

From the looks of it you are one of the few who didn't vote for him

She's been on board with MN sports for a long time. Politics has nothing to do with it. Keep that crap out of here.

No....Some feelings are going to be hurt in this thread

Yes, because all freshmen qb's start their careers looking like seniors 😵‍💫.

Murray and crew still swinging for Tanner.

Should we still be looking in the transfer portal for a QB as we were told by the geniuses? 🤡

Yes, we get it you dont like Simon...your take makes zero sense. Not sure how he develops WR's has anything to do with how the would run the offense. Hes co-oc, but we have no clue what that means or to what capacity hes involved. To say any of these points is a strike against him as an OC is...

The pessimist in me says we've seen this slasher before

Need a defensive TD

Adjusting for strength of opponent about 74 of Morgan's attempts came against teams that probably didn't get 20 feet from Tanner. That gets us a .088 sacks/att for Morgan. Context matters

11,000 posts in a year Murray: hold my beer

Not to be confused with the floor or ceiling poster.

Debatable

Yes throw up stats against garbage non-conf teams. Hard hitting stats boomer. 😵‍💫

Sweet stats bro....does that somehow invalidate my statement?

As Mo and the defense have done for 95% of Tanners wins....what's your point? That has been this teams recipe for victory for years.