Search results

Good read, thanks.

I was gonna click, but it's si.com so probably AI generated and with mistakes?

Good point, I forgot to consider that unlimited NIL won't make up for the difference in revenue sharing for a majority of the players.

I agree that the closest would be SEC and B1G together, but the players could easily threaten to jump to the ACC and make that the premier conference for college football. I don't really care to see a capped league though that spreads the losses around more evenly. I still like teams coming...

Not.Gonna.Happen. Why in the world would anyone think these athletes will voluntarily come together to limit their compensation???? This isn't the NFL, there is no group of owners that can lock the players out. If the B1G tries, all the talent goes to the SEC, etc. If the NCAA tries, how can...

And that's what the best ones will do, they'll sign in a different conference. And then it'll just be analogous to before NIL: Before NIL: B1G schools make you go to class and SEC doesn't. After NIL: B1G schools make you be a part of CBA, SEC doesn't. Now they get their advantage again.

But then who goes first? Like, why would the B1G athletes want to lock themselves into "restrictions" while the SEC sits idle and lets their athletes continue with unlimited restrictions? And what would the motivation be for the SEC to try, now that they have a recruiting advantage over the B1G?

Who would the players be "bargaining" against? Any answer you provide will be easily explained away as "not happening", but alas, I'm sure you'll try anyways.

Can you explain more? If there are better schedules, doesn't that muddy the waters? I guess what I mean is, when these conferences last expanded people on here were talking that top teams were gonna have to get used to more losses because now Texas and Oklahoma are in the SEC waters, Oregon...

Yeah, you have all teams agreeing to not try and do what Miami is doing to Duke.

While technically true, if you compare where he went to high school to where he'll be playing next year, most people wouldn't feel like they're in the same state. I mean, this was the description of one of the events before one of their home games last year: Not much in common with the...

Didn't know that, thanks. Maybe it's just me, but Senior Female would come off better. Senior Woman just came off as old fashioned and rude, and I think that's why I thought it was a mistake.

I gotta agree. From 2025 and 2026 on the list you have, I only recognized one name, and that's because the guy went to Michigan and people kept mentioning his $12M or whatever. I used to follow high school recruiting way more and I knew the top players at almost all positions. Your post made...

I gotta admit, when I read the first two titles I assumed the author screwed up, but then there's that third title. It exists.

Yeah, I bet the thought process went about like this, "lemme think of another team that hasn't had a lot of success and had plenty of down years like Indiana", then he identifies us and thinks, "well, QB is the most important position on the field so if they get one they can turn things around"...

Was just gonna post the exact same thing.

Not sure I've ever heard the title "Senior Woman Administrator". I think I know what he meant, but man.... That being said, the article makes the home games seem like a real cool experience.

Redshirt freshman. Glad he found a spot!

Either way, QB isn't the limiting factor like ol' Bundy claimed. None of the Heisman finalists would have gotten us to the CFP with our offensive line, WRs, etc.

If not for that performance in Seattle, this would have a great chance of being spot on!