Search results

Honest question (and I'm not being argumentative), but why don't you believe the numbers? I've heard a number of people say this and I just don't know why the numbers wouldn't be true. Winning at football is clearly lucrative for schools, you'd think teams would pay to win more football games...

I'd take him in a heartbeat, he is widely considered a top coach.

Yep, he doesn't look like he's shooting, it looks like he's thinking about how to shoot.

Yep, I was hoping for a shooter who wouldn't be a massive liability elsewhere. He is actually just a good basketball player who happens to be a good shooter.

Reynolds was fantastic on Saturday, he was the player of the game, but I had absolutely no idea Grayson Grove had that in him.

To be honest, it takes a commitment to the offense in a way that can be frustrating when you don't have the pieces. If you have a good guard (Willis, Carr, Mason, etc.) it can be tempting to go with a weave and a high pick and roll. That kind of offense is needed in moments, but when it's all...

I can't find a ton of footage of him playing, so in the limited games I've seen, I really like him as a prospect. I say this as a compliment, but he is your typical athletic project big. Frankly, if he was consistently as good as his best moments, he wouldn't be coming here. He has flashes...

Yep, I used to care. Now, it's a plus I suppose. I care about it as much as I care about the character of the players on the Vikings or whatever TV show I'm currently streaming. It's all professional now.

He looked so good at the end of the year I didn't know whether to be annoyed he didn't play more or excited we had another competent OL. Stoked to have him coming back!

It's like everything. They made the right hire and they had some things fall into place. I'm not going to call it luck because those things don't fall into place unless they have done the legwork. As far as the money goes, I don't think those efforts would have had any legs if they went 4-8...

Welcome back! I'm hoping for a resurgence like Elijah Spencer had in year 2.

With the new rules on eligibility, I'm expecting Mo to be a player/coach.

I get that but we're sort of conflating two things. Nike has the "brand" deals with schools. Phil Knight also gives a ton of money to help fund Oregon's NIL - specifically. One poster argued that Phil Knight has a tremendous ROI into that NIL fund I understand the return on brand deals. I'm...

Companies literally project this every day.

Because it's not going to happen.

I'm hoping we consolidate some of those funds and get 1 higher end RT. The OL seems close (IMO) to being decent but that RT position could haunt us.

Do you think Nike makes massive ROI on their investment into Oregon? If yes, it would seem strange why they wouldn't do this with 8-10 more teams.

Just as an FYI, I don't expect it to mean much, but UND's (Fruechte was OC) offense last year was more of a traditional RPO - Spread.

This was a guy I was worried about. Pumped he's back.

Most of them.