Search results

Even if the guess is loss of playing time, assuming she still would likely play in the next five off the bench, why not stay and transfer at the end of the season? How does sitting out a year help her? There must be more than losing a starting role or loss of playing time. One of my favorite...

It is absolutely ridiculous that they can’t release their schedule. The Men’s has been out there for weeks. Even posting known dates with a note that more are TBD would be helpful.

Men's non-conference released today. When do we expect to get Women's?

So who will be the replacement?

Do not misunderstand, I am for keeping Coach P. But in this new chapter, she will be coaching some (not all) "professional athletes". Maybe promising a 7th grader that she will still be here in 2032 is important? My point was since players can move almost at will, why does length of contact...

And maybe should be a new thread? Why does it matter in this new age of NIL and Portal Transfers? The emphasis on a coach being there 4 years from now is no longer as important as it used to be to recruits. They are no longer bound to their team more than a year. On the other hand, it is...

You must get the physical paper? I only have it electronically

This was a well written article explaining how it works.

If Youngblood reported it, I couldn't find on StarTribune

source: Raoul for IN, On3 for OUT and recruits Team In Out 25-26 Recruits UCLA 6 2 USC 2 4 1 Illinois 2 2 5 Indiana 5 6 2 Iowa 1 1 3 Maryland 3 1 3 Michigan 2 1 3 Michigan State 3 3 3 Minnesota 2 1 2 Nebraska 3 1 Northwestern 1 2 1 Ohio State 1 2 1 Oregon 3 2...

Maybe he checked the blog here. 67% gave a B rating in an earlier thread.

Difficult to know. Unless a MN player wants to play at home, portal recruiting has not been a strength for the program. Could be money, playing time, cold winters.

Updating the chart. Thought it might be useful to also see incoming 25-26 recruits. Used Raoul for IN and On3 for OUT. Happy Easter Team In Out 25-26 Recruits UCLA 6 2 USC 1 4 1 Illinois 2 2 5 Indiana 4 6 2 Iowa 1 3 Maryland 3 1 3 Michigan 2 1 3 Michigan State 3 3 3...

Portal closes on Wednesday. If a team brings in a high profile player on Thursday which sort of upsets the apple cart (i.e. starting or playing time), doesn't it preclude other players from leaving? Of course, you run the risk of not geting the high profile player by waiting. Just wonder if...

I updated the table I posted last week. I still used Raoul (primarily for IN) and ON3 for OUT (based on earlier comments). Indiana University - Women's Basketball Team In Out UCLA 6 USC 4 Illinois 2 2 Indiana 4 6 Iowa 1 Maryland 2 1 Michigan 2 1 Michigan State 2 3...

Chantel Jennings of The Athletic ranks players uncommitted in portal. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6245401/2025/04/16/womens-basketball-transfer-portal-olivia-miles-cotie-mcmahon/?source=dailyemail&campaign=601983&userId=11646999&source=dailyemail 1. Serah Williams WI F 2. MiLaysia Fulwiley...

Perhaps the tweet was related to Men BB and FB each getting a player?

I was more concerned about Maryland. But you have a point.

MiLaysia Fulwiley enters portal, leaving South Carolina. Hopefully doesn't end up in Big 10.

It must be a sticky situation to recruit in the portal. If a player is demanding a starting position and a team says okay that might disrupt a team. If that results in a current starter being displaced and the portal is still open, then the "offended" starter hits the portal. And perhaps...