Search results

It’s a gauntlet The west and south are deep right now The north might be the most interesting to me the east is the most boring

My road game is wrigley this year Enjoy!

I think the team is going 10-2! But if they’re 8-4 with wins against Wisconsin and Iowa the other two losses in my opinion would be Cal on the road with a freshmen QB and Nebraska But I don’t know. Those games against Rutgers and Michigan state are 60-40 games Would definitely pick gophers to...

Nebraska Cal Rutgers Michigan state All power 5 teams that will be between 5-8 wins I think. Buffalo Northwestern Northwestern state Purdue I see those 4 as wins Ohio state and Oregon I see as losses The 6 games: Wisconsin Iowa Nebraska Michigan state Rutgers Cal Make or break the...

If we continue to win 8-9 in 75% of seasons we will eventually break through

True. My old definition of success pre expansion was 7+ wins My new definition is 5+ conference wins. 5-4 or better could seem a little disappointing due to circumstances but it will never be seen as a failure.

Getting rid of conference championship games would greatly increase the chances of a big ten title in my lifetime. Because co championships would likely come back If the bids become automatic by league. 10 conference games is announced shortly after that.

5-4 or better is a success But it could be successful and also disappointing if it’s 7-5 (5-4)

The only reason why you’d keep him is if AD believes his fate is tied to the HC’s

Got it I’m still not sure that cap will hold up long term

Good idea if only it were legal to cap it

Because in wet conditions in the first game at the power 5 level the gophers lost by missing a field goal Because the defense couldn’t get off the field and the team only had a few possessions in the second half. On those possessions the OL got worked in an 11 on 11 game The gophers turned the...

They can’t Maybe congress can! I don’t know if you have been paying attention to politics since about 1999 but I don’t know if I would bet on the politicians to figure it out….

Fair take I think 16 is too big if there are only 5 auto bids Should be more auto bids than at larges in my opinion. So at 16 I would like top 9 conference champs With 5 conference champs I like 8 With 12, would love top 7 conference chanps The expansion of bids doesn’t devalue the regular...

Because current federal case law says you can’t be forced into a union against your wishes

6-6 Alabama wouldn’t make the playoffs in this. If the SEC got 7 last year the worst team by rank would’ve been 9-3 Missouri

Thats why I don’t think it’ll happen I don’t think there’ll ever be a real contract with players if you mean collective bargaining. It would limit compensation for the best players so I’m not sure why they would join in the collective bargaining effort

Yes it’s money The argument for 24 is money The argument against is how to split the money We literally already have a fifth place 9-3 SEC team arguing they should be in in the current format so that’s not much of a change

To make the regular season more valuable Doing that would make about 10 huge games a year less valuable but would make dozens of games more valuable. Plus would add 12 playoff games. The answer to everything is money. Which is why 24 with all champs in won’t happen.

I have asked for 24 before I haven’t seen much over 25 24 would be every conference champs. Some leagues get 2, 3, 4 etc based on a 5 year coefficient rating based on RPI of teams in leagues. For instance in 24 over the last 5 years. (Making this up but it should be a mathematical formula)...