Minnesota Vs. New Mexico - Rate Bowl - Media Predictions

Donate To GopherHole
IceBoxGopher said:
Rock M Nation sides with Minnesota in the game.
Tough one to call. Minnesota isn’t very good, but their defense is. New Mexico isn’t very good and… well, nothing about them is. They’re just more mediocre overall than the Gophers. Still, I think this is the type of game you win if you’re a power conference team.

Sports Grid predicts a 27-21 New Mexico victory
Low-key, New Mexico is one of the most under-appreciated teams in college football. Whoever tunes into the Rate Bowl will be pleasantly surprised.
Click to expand...
I've always found the Missouri Tigers SB Nation predictions to be spot on
 

MNGoph24 said:
Rock does know New Mexico is 9-3, played Michigan tough on the road, and beat UCLA on the road right? Seems like too many people are underestimating New Mexico or think they will just mail it in. Unlike other teams, they will come out in full force, and likely dominate.
Click to expand...
New Mexico is a good matchup for the Gophers and they may indeed win this crappy bowl game. But, the Gophers are the betting favorites and I think that is fair. Either way you are definitely drinking more Lobos kool aid than any person I have come across in my 16 years on this board.
 

TwistingMyMelon said:
Yeah, I don't see what the big deal is about the receivers who entered the portal. We had 233 receptions this season. The wide receivers who hit the portal combined for 8 of them. Fame had another 12.
Click to expand...
I think the RB situation as interesting as the WR one. With Fame having declared for the portal, he is off the roster now, right? So, with Fame and AJ Turner (season-ending injury) out, it’s Cam as first back-up and then Washington and/or Ford. True Frosh might see some significant snaps.
 

Schnauzer said:
New Mexico is a good matchup for the Gophers and they may indeed win this crappy bowl game. But, the Gophers are the betting favorites and I think that is fair. Either way you are definitely drinking more Lobos kool aid than any person I have come across in my 16 years on this board.
Click to expand...
He predicted Syracuse and VATech would crush the Gophers in past bowl games also. Bad takes is what he does best.
 

Schnauzer said:
New Mexico is a good matchup for the Gophers and they may indeed win this crappy bowl game. But, the Gophers are the betting favorites and I think that is fair. Either way you are definitely drinking more Lobos kool aid than any person I have come across in my 16 years on this board.
Click to expand...
That’s because they are not a Gopher fan, likely someone from the east or south, and is just a hater. Had them on ignore for a long time and I’m pretty sure I haven’t missed much quality content from them.
 


Unregistered User said:
That’s because they are not a Gopher fan, likely someone from the east or south, and is just a hater. Had them on ignore for a long time and I’m pretty sure I haven’t missed much quality content from them.
Click to expand...
ah, I missed that - probably because it is sort of a forgettable user name. Given that history I will add to ignore as well. Thanks.
 

MNGoph24 said:
Rock does know New Mexico is 9-3, played Michigan tough on the road, and beat UCLA on the road right? Seems like too many people are underestimating New Mexico or think they will just mail it in. Unlike other teams, they will come out in full force, and likely dominate.
Click to expand...

Are you actually reading what has been posted here? The majority (a fairly lopsided one to boot) of the predictions posted here are picking New Mexico.

I'm sure those predicting this game know New Mexico's record. That information would be pretty difficult to miss.
 

Gophergrandpa said:
I think the RB situation as interesting as the WR one. With Fame having declared for the portal, he is off the roster now, right? So, with Fame and AJ Turner (season-ending injury) out, it’s Cam as first back-up and then Washington and/or Ford. True Frosh might see some significant snaps.
Click to expand...

There have been players in the past (although not Gophers) who have entered the portal and still played for their current team's bowl games but I don't see any indication that Fame will do that. I suspect that he didn't get the deal he wanted, or the assurances he wanted, or he just wanted to leave Minnesota.

I wondered why Fleck didn't play Washington or Ford in some of these late season games. Perhaps he intended to save them for the bowl.
 

Schnauzer said:
ah, I missed that - probably because it is sort of a forgettable user name. Given that history I will add to ignore as well. Thanks.
Click to expand...

While I have more than my fair share of people from this site on ignore, I wouldn't put this guy on ignore. Given that the Gophers are slightly favored by the betting markets, Fleck's perfect record (6-0) in bowls, and the MW conference champ losing 38-10 to Washington in the LA Bowl, I find his passionate belief that the Gophers will get stomped by UNM to be bizarre and somewhat fascinating.
 



TwistingMyMelon said:
While I have more than my fair share of people from this site on ignore, I wouldn't put this guy on ignore. Given that the Gophers are slightly favored by the betting markets, Fleck's perfect record (6-0) in bowls, and the MW conference champ losing 38-10 to Washington in the LA Bowl, I find his passionate belief that the Gophers will get stomped by UNM to be bizarre and somewhat fascinating.
Click to expand...
If this was his take on just this year's rate bowl - I would also find the opinion to be bizarre and somewhat fascinating. But as a couple others have pointed out this isn't an isolated opinion. Apparently this guy has felt the Gophers were going to be blown out by their previous two bowl opponents too, as well as Wisconsin every year. I read through his posting history and it comes off as subtle but consistent trolling. After that the decision to add to the ignore list was an easy one.
 

Schnauzer said:
If this was his take on just this year's rate bowl - I would also find the opinion to be bizarre and somewhat fascinating. But as a couple others have pointed out this isn't an isolated opinion. Apparently this guy has felt the Gophers were going to be blown out by their previous two bowl opponents too, as well as Wisconsin every year. I read through his posting history and it comes off as subtle but consistent trolling. After that the decision to add to the ignore list was an easy one.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info! Well, I'll give him credit for the feigned act of concern anyway. He almost pulled it off!
 
Last edited:

Does anybody know where I can find the media bowl predictions thread?
 

Unregistered User said:
That’s because they are not a Gopher fan, likely someone from the east or south, and is just a hater. Had them on ignore for a long time and I’m pretty sure I haven’t missed much quality content from them.
Click to expand...
If I wasn’t a Gophers fan, would I have bought these? I have more too, even from bowl games I admit I was wrong about.

1766067757827.jpeg

I deep down hope and pray I’m wrong about the game next week as well. I hope you all laugh if the Golden Gophers end up winning and prove me wrong.

I feel like the media and fans are treating this like a cupcake non conference game. If New Mexico had the same record as Minnesota or even .500 I could see that when you factor in a power conference advantage.

However, they have two more wins than Minnesota, beaten and played tough versus two Big Ten teams on the road that Minnesota couldn’t do, and Minnesota doesn’t have many impressive victories. Add in the eventual opt outs and transfers (which are all or will be all coming from Minnesota’s side as I haven’t heard about any transfers or opt outs on New Mexico’s end of things) and the talent gap isn’t very large when you compare the teams either.

After years of Minnesota sports breaking my heart, I’m a pessimistic and also very superstitious Gopher fan. I’m even scared as the image number on my phone was an unlucky one too. So, I’m sorry if they lose, because of that and me. 😭
 
Last edited:



MNGoph24 said:
If I wasn’t a Gophers fan, would I have bought these? I have more too, even from bowl games I admit I was wrong about.

View attachment 40948

I deep down hope and pray I’m wrong about the game next week as well. I hope you all laugh if the Golden Gophers end up winning and prove me wrong.

I feel like the media and fans are treating this like a cupcake non conference game. If New Mexico had the same record as Minnesota or even .500 I could see that when you factor in a power conference advantage.

However, they have two more wins than Minnesota, beaten and played tough versus two Big Ten teams on the road that Minnesota couldn’t do, and Minnesota doesn’t have many impressive victories. Add in the eventual opt outs and transfers and the talent gap isn’t very large when you compare the teams either.

After years of Minnesota sports breaking my heart, I’m a pessimistic and also very superstitious Gopher fan. I’m even scared as the image number on my phone was an unlucky one too. So, I’m sorry if they lose, because of that and me. 😭
Click to expand...
Ok, sweatshirts prove you are a gopher fan. I don’t think you are alone in this (goofballs picking New Mexico, Wisconsin, etc) despite them being inferior teams.

You do however have a unique passion for writing treatise on why the gophers will lose — I think it’s either 1) a philosophical seppuku solidified from the years of battering via metrodome era or 2) a humiliation kink.

I suspect 2 because you do this frequently and never learn.
 

Odd Shark expects a New Mexico victory
This year's Rate Bowl features New Mexico (9-3) and Minnesota (7-5). The Golden Gophers are 2.5-point favorites despite recording fewer regular-season wins, and the total for this game is 45.5 points. The Lobos are riding a six-game win streak into this bowl matchup, and I believe that momentum should help them finish their season with 10 wins.

New Mexico hasn't played a ton of elite teams during that stretch, but the Golden Gophers have been underwhelming despite average competition. New Mexico's only losses of the season came against Michigan, San Jose State, and Boise State. The San Jose State game provides a small amount of concern, but the Lobos' relative abandonment of the run game was a big factor in that defeat.

Minnesota, meanwhile, dropped contests to Cal, Ohio State, Iowa, Oregon, and Northwestern. While you could expect the Golden Gophers to drop some of those games, there are a few unfortunate drops. Their wins also haven't been particularly impressive, which doesn't help me build any confidence in them.

Outside of beating then-No. 25 Nebraska, which finished 7-5, all of Minnesota's wins came against programs that finished the campaign with losing records. I'd expect New Mexico defensive end Keyshawn James-Newby to be a big factor when Minnesota is on offense. He led the Mountain West with eight sacks, and he also tallied 13 tackles for loss and a pair of forced fumbles.

Offensively for the Lobos, look for steady quarterback play from Jack Layne to complement running backs Damon Bankston, DJ McKinney, and Scottre Humphrey, who rushed for 578, 454, and 349 yards this season, respectively. Wide receiver Keegan Johnson should also be featured plenty.

College Football News goes with Minnesota in their full prediction, 26-20
New Mexico's pass defense is just okay. The Lobos were able to get by in the Mountain West, and it barreled over UCLA, but it'll give up well over 200 yards to Lindsey, who should connect on close to 70% of his throws.

Here's the problem with that. There won't be anything downfield, and again, this Lobo defense can tackle. The Big Ten bulk and talent will come through in the second half, but Minnesota is 7-0 at home, 0-5 away from Minneapolis, and New Mexico won't go away until late.

But it's P.J. Fleck. He wins bowl games.

Rivals has New Mexico winning, 26-23
Minnesota will have moments, but New Mexico’s physicality, defensive discipline, and ability to control tempo should decide the game late. The Lobos won’t flinch, and they won’t beat themselves. New Mexico wins a close, hard-nosed bowl game.
 

TwistingMyMelon said:
There have been players in the past (although not Gophers) who have entered the portal and still played for their current team's bowl games but I don't see any indication that Fame will do that. I suspect that he didn't get the deal he wanted, or the assurances he wanted, or he just wanted to leave Minnesota.

I wondered why Fleck didn't play Washington or Ford in some of these late season games. Perhaps he intended to save them for the bowl.
Click to expand...
Fleck not giving some reps to depth players is something he has done consistently. The only outlier I can think of was Northwestern State this year.

Particularly at running back, but at other positions as well, he tends to pick his horse and stay with it regardless of outcomes.

It's my sincere hope that DT does NOT get the majority of the carries. We have to figure out a way to get him and keep him healthy - that is more important than another nothing bowl victory.

This game does nothing for us other than perpetuate the idea that our current bowl streak is something of a significant accomplishment (now, if they were all Citrus Bowl or better, that WOULD be something), which diminishes the accomplishment that the victory over Auburn really was.

Beating the Frosh/Soph VaTech team last year, and not convincingly (but never in doubt) with many starters into the 4th quarter, is not something to brag about.
 

IceBoxGopher said:
Odd Shark expects a New Mexico victory

Outside of beating then-No. 25 Nebraska, which finished 7-5, all of Minnesota's wins came against programs that finished the campaign with losing records. I'd expect New Mexico defensive end Keyshawn James-Newby to be a big factor when Minnesota is on offense. He led the Mountain West with eight sacks, and he also tallied 13 tackles for loss and a pair of forced fumbles.
Click to expand...
We don't have much in the way of impressive victories outside of the Nebraska win but I would argue that New Mexico's 9 wins haven't exactly come against the who's who of college football.

They beat two teams with winning records - UNLV and Utah State by a combined total of 8 points. They have 1 power 4 win against UCLA before the coaching change when they were playing like complete and total garbage as opposed to the somewhat respectable garbage they played like over the remainder of the season.

I expect this to be a good game that could certainly go either way depending on which team makes the most mistakes. I just think it is interesting to look at the various ways sites use to come up with their predictions on games and how often they really aren't all that well researched.
 

caliGopher said:
Particularly at running back, but at other positions as well, he tends to pick his horse and stay with it regardless of outcomes.
Click to expand...
I will agree there are times (especially on offense) where it feels like Fleck could have gone to backups and didn't in games where the outcome was decided (good or bad).

But I disagree on the regardless of outcomes part. Fans love to convince themselves there is a better option on the bench that the coach refuses to play and that belief gets pushed hard around here by a handful of posters.

Coaches at this level are going to play the guys they feel give their team the best chance to win games. Because in the end if they don't win enough games they get fired.
 

MNVCGUY said:
I will agree there are times (especially on offense) where it feels like Fleck could have gone to backups and didn't in games where the outcome was decided (good or bad).

But I disagree on the regardless of outcomes part. Fans love to convince themselves there is a better option on the bench that the coach refuses to play and that belief gets pushed hard around here by a handful of posters.

Coaches at this level are going to play the guys they feel give their team the best chance to win games. Because in the end if they don't win enough games they get fired.
Click to expand...
You know next to nothing about how choices are made on who plays and who doesn’t. There is zero chance 74 was our best option at RG this year but they played him anyway.
 

It appears to me that New Mexico has some key contributors from their team that have already entered the transfer portal. A good defensive back, a good offensive lineman, and a decent tight end wide receiver on running back. All look like they are transferring out and not playing. Are you guys seeing the same thing?
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom