Recent content by dbmn

I'm with you. It hurts though when they leave the next year.

What an a..wipe. Nobody asked you to comment.

Had to make a change, albeit 1 year too late on CBJ. High expectations were applied to Pitino, Smith and Monson yet each replacement was no better than the previous and sometimes worse. Every year, same thing...new coach and or new players are going to revive the gopher's bb team to mid-to...

Which article (WIKI, The Daily, CBS News, Pioneer Press) are you referring to about whom (Clem or Rachel Hardeman)? Wrong about what? Really? "JHC", "dude", "own it". Seems overly passionate.

Yep. Lawyer, Judges, government definitely makes it "tricky".

The investigation was done prior to the firing/termination of guilt so the "proof" was already determined... The issue I have is why a person employed by the state/government has a different set of rules than the other 99.9% of people working in the "real" world.

How does a contract allow for allow for employment after fraud/crime is discovered?

Read multiple different articles indicating Head coach Clem Haskins, men's athletic director Mark Dienhart, and university vice president McKinley Boston all resigned on June 25, 1999. The decision was made and agreed to in June...no specific date given but multiple articles insinuate it was...

IDK about your comments and invalid points to the entire argument going on between 2 people. Originally, I wanted to know why the academic employee was given 30 days before being fired. What does anything you said contribute to answering that question. Answer: nothing.

Well, my comment says 6/10/99 when it was agreed that Clem was gone. To 6/30/99 is 20 days.

I never claimed Clem didn't get due process, but due process doesn't equate to a 30-day notice or NOT. According to a CBS news article on 6/10/99, Clem was given until 6/30/99...20 days. And the other person in this argument said he was given the month of July. His statement doesn't jive...

CYA for what? You don't know nor do I, that Clem was given a choice to resign or terminated in 30 days. Sorry, but a UofM Daily article is the same as WIKI. Again, all I wanted to know was why the academic wasn't fired immediately after the determination of plagiarism.

Wrong about what...dude? 25 years ago, and WIKI is your absolute source for "facts". There are no definitive "facts" about the timing of the firing related to discovery and determination of fault by the uom administration. Still want to know why the academic wasn't fired immediately? Should...

WIKI? There are no incorrect "facts" there. The Pioneer Press is not the administration. When the administration investigated and determined there was cause, he was gone immediately. So why was the academic employee allowed to stay employed for month after determination they were fired for...

Haskins was terminated immediately. Why not Hardeman?