My new totally arbitrary goal for gopher football is for us to have a season where we beat Iowa and Wisconsin before the next time we have a season where we lose to both Iowa and Wisconsin.
Over the last four years, PJ'S B1G winning percentage is exactly .500, and you have to go back 5 years to find a season where he finished better than one game over .500 (5-4). I think it's fair to make an argument that consistency and the 2019 high water mark warrant a higher ranking, but being...
Ive never understood the rule (or the delay on postseason eligibility in other sports when moving up to D1). If a school that moves up is good earn to earn a postseason berth, what is the benefit of letting them play? Why was the rule there in the first place?
Seems like a pretty fair list. When I saw the title of the thread,the first thing that jumped to my mind was loving how we play against Wisconsin and hating how we play against Iowa.
Multiple things can be true at the same time.
1)if we hired a coach as good as Cignetti, we could have a similar experience as Indiana
2) PJ has done well here and we have been reasonably successful during his tenure
3) evaluating coaches is hard, if we decided to move on from PJ to chase...
If im understanding the problem right, it is fair to complain about the U taking your money, not providing the spot you paid for, and not refunding your money, even if the reason for the spot unavailability is reasonable.
Everyone knows airlines overbooks their flights. That means sometimes...
When my team finds itself in a position to clinch a post season berth by simply preserving a 6-1 lead heading into the ninth at home, Im not concerned with the equities of the tiebreaker criteria.
Thats brutal. I always assumed that a spot in the ramp is included when you buy a spot in the ramp. Guess I was wrong.
Sounds like the Seinfeld rental car bit. "We have the reservation, we just dont have a car." "But the reservation keeps the car here, thats why we have the reservation."
Maybe it will be like the 2020 football season, where the league changes the rules once it realizes it doesn't like the outcome under the rules the season started with.
I like what ive seen so far this off-season, though when all is said and done, ill evaluate Medved by whether and how much his team wins, not whether I am impressed with his recruiting.
Players from the bench of elite teams intrigue me. If we get the right ones, they have three things going for...