Anyone who's ever been involved with event planning can tell you with 100% certainty that things never go exactly as planned. There will always be things that happen that aren't always great. It is inevitable. So, even if you have planned accordingly, it isn't always ideal. The plan they had didn't work in some areas. Now they know. Now they have to adjust and hope their new plan works.
So they planned accordingly? How do you know that? Let's just be honest about the opening day fan experience. What went well?
- The team played outdoors at home and were victorious - awesome!
- The weather was spectacular!
- The scoreboard was very cool - the video was amazing!
- The band sounded great!
- Everything was very clean
- The stadium employees I interacted with seemed professional and courteous
- Tailgating was fun and easy at the Fairgrounds
- Restrooms - the restrooms were great and quick (male)
- Gameday program - easy to find and purchase - nice production
- The co-eds looked fantastic
But if we can agree on all the greatness, let's now break down the points of contact between the U personnel/processes and the fans - where do the two meet during a gameday?
-
Gates - well documented that it was slower than expected/necessary to get into the stadium - they've known for those 18-months of planning that they'd have 50,000 people to move into the stadium in a set amount of time. I'm not even MAD about the gate situation as I think it will improve - but their plan was less than adequate - can we agree on that?
-
Concessions - we can agree that the concessions situation was wholly unacceptable, right? The results in the stadium do not indicate a lack of execution (I don't see complaints about rude or untrained staff or incompetent service) but rather a lack of planning to serve 50K. Running out of food = horrible planning. So it's wrong to call out incompetent planning? They PLANNED to have no cash registers for example - that's not worth pointing out as a potential issue?
-
Transportation - again, a complete debacle of planning. There were only a few staff/security/police officers directing people at the St. Paul pickup spot after the game. There was no visible signage to tell people where to queue up or how to proceed in an efficient or safe way. They were actually using school buses (one door) as part of their plan. Again, how is it somehow unfair to suggest that they didn't plan well? There were 3 and 4 year old kids having to wait in the mass of people with no access to food/water/restrooms and really no way to get out of the crush of people once they were in it - that's a convenience issue at best and a safety issue (especially for kids) at worst.
So the three primary areas of logistical concern were completely blown. Do you not agree? Again, I'm not even blaming the people who were doing their best on gameday to service the customers...they were victims of poor planning all around.
Get over yourself. You act as if they have been sitting around for the last 18 months without doing anything or trying to figure it out. Like it was some intentional thing just to get at good old Clyde Tester as if the world is out to get you.
How is this possibly about me? The issues I mentioned were non-factors for me...I didn't mind the wait into the stadium (I expected it to be a zoo and planned accordingly); I wasn't hungry enough to need concessions, and I had to leave the game early because my child was tired (so the transportation back to St. Paul was no problem). So now that you know I have no personal stake in ANY of the fore-mentioned problems, how exactly is this about Clyde Tester? The only person making this about me is you.
Celebrate the day for crying out loud. It was a truly great day in Gopher history and we have people on here acting as if their dog died.
I personally had a fantastic time on opening day...what a day and what a stadium! It was a great day and a Gopher victory!
So pointing out problems and hoping for implemented solutions = crying as if a dog died. Got it. I'm pretty sure I'm not the one with a problem of perspective.
