WilliamsArenaGuy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,082
- Reaction score
- 2,509
- Points
- 113
Wisconsin, OSU, and Penn State all went 10-8 in the conference.
Minnesota and Michigan went 9-9.
Guess what? The first three played Indiana and Iowa four times. The latter two played them three times. We did not get Iowa at home (a near certain win), and Michigan did not get to play Indiana twice. This further validates that all five of these teams are so close and need to be looked at with a microscope. I think us and Michigan are every bit as good or better than those first three teams and this schedule quirk is the only difference. We should not be seen as inferior because of conference record.
Furthermore, we beat Wisconsin twice. OSU beat Michigan twice. Wisconsin beat Michigan twice. Michigan beat us twice. PSU didn't beat anyone twice, but they of course have all the "big" conference wins. Also, all of these teams lost to Iowa on the road, and we did not.
As bad as we have looked at times (and we definitely should have beat Michigan, that's our own fault), it would be a travesty for us to be left out over any of these teams (esp. Wisconsin), IMO.
I know conferences don't get bids; that's why I think the BT might get 8 teams in. But if there were four spots left and these teams were fighting for them, I think PSU has to be the one left out. They have some nice wins, but they also lost to URI and Temple, played a godawful NC schedule and didn't sweep any of their main competition in conference. We played a bad NC too, but beating Louisville is far above and of PSU's accomplishments. Their best NC win was against Mount St. Mary's (not St. Mary's).
Just please beat NU. We really should be able to feel pretty good then. Please...
(and then at least show up against MSU this time)
Minnesota and Michigan went 9-9.
Guess what? The first three played Indiana and Iowa four times. The latter two played them three times. We did not get Iowa at home (a near certain win), and Michigan did not get to play Indiana twice. This further validates that all five of these teams are so close and need to be looked at with a microscope. I think us and Michigan are every bit as good or better than those first three teams and this schedule quirk is the only difference. We should not be seen as inferior because of conference record.
Furthermore, we beat Wisconsin twice. OSU beat Michigan twice. Wisconsin beat Michigan twice. Michigan beat us twice. PSU didn't beat anyone twice, but they of course have all the "big" conference wins. Also, all of these teams lost to Iowa on the road, and we did not.
As bad as we have looked at times (and we definitely should have beat Michigan, that's our own fault), it would be a travesty for us to be left out over any of these teams (esp. Wisconsin), IMO.
I know conferences don't get bids; that's why I think the BT might get 8 teams in. But if there were four spots left and these teams were fighting for them, I think PSU has to be the one left out. They have some nice wins, but they also lost to URI and Temple, played a godawful NC schedule and didn't sweep any of their main competition in conference. We played a bad NC too, but beating Louisville is far above and of PSU's accomplishments. Their best NC win was against Mount St. Mary's (not St. Mary's).
Just please beat NU. We really should be able to feel pretty good then. Please...
(and then at least show up against MSU this time)