Big 12 schools may refuse to play Texas A & M because of Sorsby ruling

MNSpaniel

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
259
Points
83
Some Big 12 schools have hinted at refusing to play Texas A & M because of the Sorsby ruling. They are meeting to discuss this and to see if they can legally do so because of conference rules and TV contracts. Schools in other conferences will looking into voiding or not scheduling future games/meets in all sports with Texas A & M.
The whole world can see this is a bad ruling. A & M got a Texas judge (I think) with ties to A & M to rule on this. It seems in most of these rulings against the NCAA there are local judges with ties to the particular school making these rulings.
 


Some Big 12 schools have hinted at refusing to play Texas A & M because of the Sorsby ruling. They are meeting to discuss this and to see if they can legally do so because of conference rules and TV contracts. Schools in other conferences will looking into voiding or not scheduling future games/meets in all sports with Texas A & M.
The whole world can see this is a bad ruling. A & M got a Texas judge (I think) with ties to A & M to rule on this. It seems in most of these rulings against the NCAA there are local judges with ties to the particular school making these rulings.
Somehow this more inaccurate than if ChatGPT wrote it.

Tech not a&m, and the judge worked in the DFW area and is a Houston grad.

Most local judges have actually been pretty reasonable (Alabama judge not allowing ex-nba player to play for the crimson tide, Tennessee grad not giving Joey Aguilar another year of eligibility, etc)
 


I doubt anything will happen, but it would be interesting if they somehow can make the CFP and NCAA basketball tourney (with multiple boycotted games on their record), who would then boycott. Just a random thought.
 





Top Bottom