Coyle on finding a big fish donor: We’re still in the boat trying to find that big fish. We still have a hook in the water.

What are you even talking about now?
I was trying to fathom what possibly could have been a reason for a negative reaction to my correct analysis of Coyle's spineless, gutless response to this question.

All I could come up with was that not being able to land a mega donor for sports was somehow taken a reflection on the quality of our university. Which is of course absurd
 


I was trying to fathom what possibly could have been a reason for a negative reaction to my correct analysis of Coyle's spineless, gutless response to this question.

All I could come up with was that not being able to land a mega donor for sports was somehow taken a reflection on the quality of our university. Which is of course absurd
Probably your sense of self superiority and angsty superlatives. You come across like the comic book guy from the Simpsons and your posts are exponentially more hilarious when I read them with that voice in my head
 

Also, since it seems that somehow some posters are imagining this: having a mega booster for sports ... has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the school. As in the actual institution. The thing that actually matters. N o t h i n g

So it's absurd to think or imply that suggesting that we'll never have such a booster is somehow a reflection/commentary on the school itself. Nonsense


You think because Cody Campbell is some psycho rich oilman trying to buy Texas Tech a natty ... that that means TT is a good school? LOL
Who are you arguing with? I don't think any person would correlate NIL spend and institutional quality.
 

Probably your sense of self superiority and angsty superlatives. You come across like the comic book guy from the Simpsons and your posts are exponentially more hilarious when I read them with that voice in my head
‘Look at him. Eating candy like a Spaniard.’
 





Top Bottom