All Things 2026 Vikings Mock Draft Thread

Wow. Just saw an incredible deep dive on the Caleb Banks injury situation(s), the severity, the treatment, and whether or not we should be worried at all.

Happened to catch this from Luke Braun, from the Locked on Vikings podcast; Braun is really good, for the record. He does his homework, more than pretty much anyone else I've seen on the Locked On network I have to say.

I can try to summarize (but I could butcher some of it) to save some of you some time if you don't want to take the 20+ minutes to listen to the conversation he had with a Pediatrist on the injury specifics. I'll put it in some kind of timeline, best I can from memory;

- Banks gets a Jones fracture on his 5th metatarsal on his left foot, very early 2025 I believe. He elects to not have surgery, let it heal (the opinion of the doctor on the pod was that he WOULD have done the surgery).

- The likelihood of re-injury for a Jones fracture if you let it heal naturally can be as high as 25%; with surgery, that reduces to as little as 4-10%

- Banks tries to play near the beginning of the 2025 season LIKELY a little too early and re-injures the Jones fracture. He then has surgery to repair.

- Heals well, he crushes most of the pre-draft stuff. During the combine (or just before?), he feels a pop in that same foot. Continues the workouts/combine, crushes the workouts still, but feels more discomfort and has it checked out.

- The initial pop was likely a small stress fracture (a bone bruise basically), in the 4th metatarsal (completely unrelated to the Jones fracture in the 5th metatarsal), that could have been fixed without surgery with 4-6 weeks in a boot; but because he continued the workouts, he made it slightly worse. They had it fixed with surgery.

Long story short, my take on this is that I have little to no concern over Banks and either of these injuries impacting him moving forward. Clearly the Vikings feel the same way.

It sounds like a number of other teams had cleared Banks 100% as the Vikings essentially did, hence them taking Banks as high as #18.

Here's the pod; the first segment is just some guy who covers the Univ of Florida, I didn't really take much from what he had to say. The 2nd two segments with the Pediatrist I thought were absolutely fascinating.

The question with these always becomes “is it bad luck or does he have something that is setting him up for it?” So many components are going to go into it such as weight he ends up at, etc.

Unless you have the actual medical records and could do physical loading on him and see the foot under stress, there’s not really any way to know. They can project for sure, but all these random docs are just speculating. I’ll trust the Vikings guys, but it certainly is a risk given they’re hinging a lot on him being available
 

The question with these always becomes “is it bad luck or does he have something that is setting him up for it?” So many components are going to go into it such as weight he ends up at, etc.

Unless you have the actual medical records and could do physical loading on him and see the foot under stress, there’s not really any way to know. They can project for sure, but all these random docs are just speculating. I’ll trust the Vikings guys, but it certainly is a risk given they’re hinging a lot on him being available

That was basically one of the last issues they brought up; in the opinion of this particular foot doctor/surgeon, these two injuries were bad luck (I'm summarizing)/

One thing that very well could have factored in; I guess Banks wore some pretty ridiculously tight-fitting shoes for the draft workouts, in order to try to be as quick and nimble as possible, when the 4th metatarsal injury occurred, crunching his feet and metatarsals together, and under the weight of about 330 pounds.

The Jones fracture does carry some risk, to be clear; somewhere around a 6-8% chance of re-injury as opposed to someone who never had the injury, but clearly a risk the Vikings and a number of other teams were willing to absorb
 

It's no coincidence that draft grades are entirely based on if a team picks who draft pundits say they should pick, or not.

Those people make a living by getting clicks, and they only get clicks if people think they know what they're talking about.

The Vikings made a lot of draft pundits look very, very stupid.

So of course, they're going to get punished with bad "grades". That's how the media works.

Who gives a shit?
 




Top Bottom