NoelarBear
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2019
- Messages
- 597
- Reaction score
- 1,824
- Points
- 93
Perhaps PJ not wanting to give any sort of info, but thought 0% chance he’d play and is out. If we are being honest, there was at least some thought given to him playing.Doubtful is encouraging!
Good test. Of course it would be better to not need the test...Hopefully we can survive 1 game without him.
Was thinking the same thing......ughTaylor is injured a lot.
Disappointing.
Hopefully we can survive 1 game without him
He played 12 games last yearTaylor is injured a lot.
Disappointing.
Agree. Excellent player but a bit injury prone.Taylor is injured a lot.
Disappointing.
Hopefully we can survive 1 game without him.
I would not be surprised.Given it's a soft tissue injury, would anyone be surprised if he misses Rutgers too?
Running backs take a beating. Also, water is wet.Agree. Excellent player but a bit injury prone.
Given it's a soft tissue injury, would anyone be surprised if he misses Rutgers too?
Yeah, if he isn't 100% it makes a lot of sense to sit him this week and give him more time.Next weekend is our first break of the season so the Rutgers game will be three weeks after the injury against NW State. That might be enough time.
They do yes. Mo was injured some too...Running backs take a beating. Also, water is wet.
Spare and a few pairs!Look, you can’t count on Taylor to be available, not talking about this game, but in general. If he’s healthy, great! My point is I don’t count on him to be available for the entire season. The way I look at it is if he plays great, but I am counting on the other backs. You know we need them. I don’t count on Taylor when I factor in our success. Go Gophers!
It was obvious he was operating at less than 100% for must of the year last year. To give him credit, he toughed it out and kept playing. But the team most certainly didn’t get his best.He played 12 games last year?