Mark Coyle: The Gophers' Michael Scott

Joined
Jan 21, 2025
Messages
31
Reaction score
83
Points
18
Mark Coyle: The Gophers’ Michael Scott

The Office had Michael Scott. The University of Minnesota has Mark Coyle—a corporate buzzword machine (“we want to move efficiently”) with a side part and no semblance of a plan to make Gopher basketball relevant in Division I.

Today, he’s classically pictured in the Star Tribune, sporting his Town and Country Club ¾ zip, playing the part. He climbs into his university-paid luxury car, reps his university-paid country club gear, and spouts his university-approved soundbites about a “top-notch practice facility,” a “historic venue” (dump), and “best-in-class mental health resources” (as if high school recruits chasing NIL money are factoring that in).

How many times have you heard Coyle lay out an inspiring, credible plan to make Minnesota basketball matter? Never. Ever. It’s always about something else—a new coach, new revenue from the House settlement. It’s never about playing offense. It’s never about innovation. It’s never about vision.

Figure out a way to start the Minnesota Basketball Academy to develop home-grown talent and start funneling kids to the U. Start the Minnesota Basketball Classic Tournament with other Power 5 Teams and Saint Thomas. Don’t let St. Thomas take over the number one Division 1 spot in the Twin Cities. Move the student’s section to the prime seating areas. Get the best minds from the Carlson School to figure out how to tackle NIL. Put your strategy together and sell it in every community in this state and to every alumnus, showing how winning the money game is going to benefit the entire University.

The Money Problem No One Wants to Solve

How is this program going to get money? How is it going to pay players? How is it ever going to get a 21st-century arena, one that opposing coaches can’t torpedo in recruiting efforts by simply asking: "Do you really want to play in a 100-year-old arena where you're going to fall off the court?

Coyle’s grand plan? Wait . . . passively wait . . . for the House money and hire a new coach. But no new coach—not even a reincarnated John Wooden or a modern-day Rick Pitino—can win with gum and twine, which is what basically holds this program together under Coyle’s “leadership.”
 


It's not that deep man.
Actually, it is. Because if there's no change in how this is approached, the same thing happens over and over. A poor basketball team, in an empty barn, that never makes it to the NCAA Tournament, that gets pummeled by Wisconsin and Iowa, and is overtaken by the University of Saint Thomas as the top Division 1 basketball team in Minnesota. Depressing.
 
Last edited:




Mark Coyle: The Gophers’ Michael Scott

The Office had Michael Scott. The University of Minnesota has Mark Coyle—a corporate buzzword machine (“we want to move efficiently”) with a side part and no semblance of a plan to make Gopher basketball relevant in Division I.

Today, he’s classically pictured in the Star Tribune, sporting his Town and Country Club ¾ zip, playing the part. He climbs into his university-paid luxury car, reps his university-paid country club gear, and spouts his university-approved soundbites about a “top-notch practice facility,” a “historic venue” (dump), and “best-in-class mental health resources” (as if high school recruits chasing NIL money are factoring that in).

How many times have you heard Coyle lay out an inspiring, credible plan to make Minnesota basketball matter? Never. Ever. It’s always about something else—a new coach, new revenue from the House settlement. It’s never about playing offense. It’s never about innovation. It’s never about vision.

Figure out a way to start the Minnesota Basketball Academy to develop home-grown talent and start funneling kids to the U. Start the Minnesota Basketball Classic Tournament with other Power 5 Teams and Saint Thomas. Don’t let St. Thomas take over the number one Division 1 spot in the Twin Cities. Move the student’s section to the prime seating areas. Get the best minds from the Carlson School to figure out how to tackle NIL. Put your strategy together and sell it in every community in this state and to every alumnus, showing how winning the money game is going to benefit the entire University.

The Money Problem No One Wants to Solve

How is this program going to get money?
How is it going to pay players? How is it ever going to get a 21st-century arena, one that opposing coaches can’t torpedo in recruiting efforts by simply asking: "Do you really want to play in a 100-year-old arena where you're going to fall off the court?

Coyle’s grand plan? Wait . . . passively wait . . . for the House money and hire a new coach. But no new coach—not even a reincarnated John Wooden or a modern-day Rick Pitino—can win with gum and twine, which is what basically holds this program together under Coyle’s “leadership.”


I hope there is someone here that is knowledgable that can help with this question. The post above is correct- Coyle was talking about waiting and seeing what comes of the "House settlement" I understand, he doesn't make the rules on this.

The scheduled date of the House settlement decision is April 7th from what I can find. The portal opens March 24th. What happens between those dates? Are we stuck with bidding on players only using NIL money which we are short on? Or is there some route to assure players that we will have revenue sharing money to deal out? It would seem that teams that have a stockpile of NIL cash would have the jump during this time. Or will players just wait for clarity (a good thing for us)?
 

Actually, it is. Because if there's no change in how this is approached, the same thing happens over and over. A poor basketball team, in an empty barn, that never makes it to the NCAA Tournament, that gets pummeled by Wisconsin and Iowa, and is overtaken by the University of Saint Thomas as the top Division 1 basketball team in Minnesota. Depressing.
Don’t get pummeled by Iowa but yes beating Wisconsin is rare.
 

"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take."

--Wayne Gretzky
----Michael Scott
------Mark Coyle
 

Mark Coyle: The Gophers’ Michael Scott

The Office had Michael Scott. The University of Minnesota has Mark Coyle—a corporate buzzword machine (“we want to move efficiently”) with a side part and no semblance of a plan to make Gopher basketball relevant in Division I.

Today, he’s classically pictured in the Star Tribune, sporting his Town and Country Club ¾ zip, playing the part. He climbs into his university-paid luxury car, reps his university-paid country club gear, and spouts his university-approved soundbites about a “top-notch practice facility,” a “historic venue” (dump), and “best-in-class mental health resources” (as if high school recruits chasing NIL money are factoring that in).

How many times have you heard Coyle lay out an inspiring, credible plan to make Minnesota basketball matter? Never. Ever. It’s always about something else—a new coach, new revenue from the House settlement. It’s never about playing offense. It’s never about innovation. It’s never about vision.

Figure out a way to start the Minnesota Basketball Academy to develop home-grown talent and start funneling kids to the U. Start the Minnesota Basketball Classic Tournament with other Power 5 Teams and Saint Thomas. Don’t let St. Thomas take over the number one Division 1 spot in the Twin Cities. Move the student’s section to the prime seating areas. Get the best minds from the Carlson School to figure out how to tackle NIL. Put your strategy together and sell it in every community in this state and to every alumnus, showing how winning the money game is going to benefit the entire University.

The Money Problem No One Wants to Solve

How is this program going to get money? How is it going to pay players? How is it ever going to get a 21st-century arena, one that opposing coaches can’t torpedo in recruiting efforts by simply asking: "Do you really want to play in a 100-year-old arena where you're going to fall off the court?

Coyle’s grand plan? Wait . . . passively wait . . . for the House money and hire a new coach. But no new coach—not even a reincarnated John Wooden or a modern-day Rick Pitino—can win with gum and twine, which is what basically holds this program together under Coyle’s “leadership.”
This^^^^^. Coyle, the man of hollow words, a thin perception of reality and a thinner sense of responsibility. He can see his shoe tassels but not a warrior's heart. I don't want players or coaches to come here to Minnesota to be someone else's Little Sisters of the Poor, which is exactly what Coyle has allowed to happen.
 






Yet our last several AD's had to use a search firm to find a new coach, Coyle never does, and finds a replacement within a week.

Pretty good for an 'empty suit'.
I like that! Let's hope that holds true here.
 




I know nothing about the Indiana situation but one thing going in Coyle's favor is competing against Beth Goetz. Unless Iowa has a lot more money than we do, we can compete on a coaching hire. I've met Beth and she's a pleasant person but she's more Coyle than Coyle. My impression was that she'd rather read a book under a tree than be in a room full of people. My guess is she'd be very uncomfortable asking people for money and find it hard to motivate top talent to work for her.
 


I know nothing about the Indiana situation but one thing going in Coyle's favor is competing against Beth Goetz. Unless Iowa has a lot more money than we do, we can compete on a coaching hire. I've met Beth and she's a pleasant person but she's more Coyle than Coyle. My impression was that she'd rather read a book under a tree than be in a room full of people. My guess is she'd be very uncomfortable asking people for money and find it hard to motivate top talent to work for her.

Coyle's 1-0 in football hires against her (Fleck > Claeys).
 

Coyle's 1-0 in football hires against her (Fleck > Claeys).

Claeys was an assistant who was elevated to the head coaching position in the middle of the season due to the head coach's health condition. The terms of his contract made him incredibly cheap to fire so I don't think he was considered a long-term solution. His one full season (2016) produced the best Minnesota football record since Mason's 10-win season in 2003. He was also 2 for 2 in bowls. Not bad for a one and half year hire.

Shoddy effort!
 


Three things that prevent Minnesota sports from winning
1. Weather - recruits hate the frigid MN weather
2. Long history of losing at Minnesota - we never win in the sports that matter
3. Poor athletic directors that lead to poor coaching choices (MN natives)
 

Claeys was an assistant who was elevated to the head coaching position in the middle of the season due to the head coach's health condition. The terms of his contract made him incredibly cheap to fire so I don't think he was considered a long-term solution. His one full season (2016) produced the best Minnesota football record since Mason's 10-win season in 2003. He was also 2 for 2 in bowls. Not bad for a one and half year hire.

Shoddy effort!
Boy, with that resume’, nevermind, Leach showed him the door too.

He was an interim coach that Goetz made full time. Thankfully Coyle saw the big picture. (He should’ve been gone after blowing the Michigan game)
 

Three things that prevent Minnesota sports from winning
1. Weather - recruits hate the frigid MN weather
2. Long history of losing at Minnesota - we never win in the sports that matter
3. Poor athletic directors that lead to poor coaching choices (MN natives)

#1 by far is an admin full of clowns that think sports are a nuisance as much as anything.
Wisconsin figured out decades ago that competitive mens hoops and football raises the tide of the entire school- alumni, academics, prestige etc
 

He was an interim coach that Goetz made full time. Thankfully Coyle saw the big picture.

He was "full-time" as an assistant. Obviously, vocabulary isn't a strength of yours.

Goetz's contract make him incredibly cheap to fire. Without that, he may not have been.
 

Three things that prevent Minnesota sports from winning
1. Weather - recruits hate the frigid MN weather
2. Long history of losing at Minnesota - we never win in the sports that matter
3. Poor athletic directors that lead to poor coaching choices (MN natives)
1. Is it balmy in Michigan and Wisconsin? 🤔
 

#1 by far is an admin full of clowns that think sports are a nuisance as much as anything.
Wisconsin figured out decades ago that competitive mens hoops and football raises the tide of the entire school- alumni, academics, prestige etc
Winning football/bb was one of the major reasons all 3 of my kids attended Madison after growing up going to gopher FB/BB games. And they went to games during the clem/tubby era so not like the recent era of Pitino/CBJ. The academics were arguable better too.
 

Winning football/bb was one of the major reasons all 3 of my kids attended Madison after growing up going to gopher FB/BB games. And they went to games during the clem/tubby era so not like the recent era of Pitino/CBJ. The academics were arguable better too.
I take it your kids are communists. 🤔😉😏
 

Actually, it is. Because if there's no change in how this is approached, the same thing happens over and over. A poor basketball team, in an empty barn, that never makes it to the NCAA Tournament, that gets pummeled by Wisconsin and Iowa, and is overtaken by the University of Saint Thomas as the top Division 1 basketball team in Minnesota. Depressing.

Gophers beat Iowa this year. And no....St. Thomas has not "overtaken" Minnesota as the top D1 basketball team in the state. lol....they had one of their best seasons while the Gophers had a season that got their coach fired.....and the Gophers are still 23 spots higher in the NET rankings.
 

#1 by far is an admin full of clowns that think sports are a nuisance as much as anything.
Wisconsin figured out decades ago that competitive mens hoops and football raises the tide of the entire school- alumni, academics, prestige etc
100% right. Madison is as cold as Minnesota or close. They commit to winning. We don't.
 

I take it your kids are communists. 🤔😉😏
Interesting conclusion but has nothing to do with the replay I made to the comment regarding the UoM administration being clowns and that successful sports programs raise the tide of the entire school- alumni, academics, prestige etc. As far as communist influence from the university I don't see any difference between MN and WI.
 





Top Bottom