I'm glad you posted this. I have not been sure of your level of support...
I think its safe to say I have more faith in the talent on defense. And have touted them.
Two postings I made about a week ago sound a lot like the story about the Smash Brothers.
In response to a Scout story about the safeties,
"The story is a little short sighted. While they focus on the safeties, there is no mention of Carter returning as one of the best corners in the league. I would love to see a player like Watkins beat out Collado on the other side and be able to provide press coverage.
The one player on defense that we need an answer on is Gary Tinsley. Will he start? His presence behind the wall of Edwards and Kirksey and Theret behind him is strength up the middle.
When it comes to the flanks, its Hageman, Rallis, and hopefully Watkins on one side.
Whilhite, Cooper, and Carter on the other.
If Theret and Royston play halves, rotate to a side, or blitz Theret and or Cooper we should still should be able to cover.
This is a case where talent is more valuable than experience.
Coach 'em up! "
And This,
"Anchoring the defensive backfield are senior starters Kim Royston and Kyle Theret. Minnesota will rely on these two head-hunters to ignite the defense with their physical play and provide leadership for a group of inexperienced defenders
I disagree with this opening sentence. First it could be argued that having Carter at corner able to press man coverage is certainly a strength, able to provide some leadership, if not be an anchor in the secondary. And then to overlook his talent and include him in a group of inexperienced defenders is the final straw. And when it comes to inexperienced defenders is he including Rallis, Cooper, Tinsley, Edwards, Kirksey? Again certainly Edwards and Kirksey have the ability to ignite the defense with their physical play.
The only true inexperienced player on the first team defense is probably the most anticipated additon. Mr. Hageman."