Home teams are 32-5. 12 teams are very high in all metric based rankings and depending on how things shake out (injuries) look like they will have at least bubble worthy resumes.
Here is my hypothetical that I wish would happen one year, just to see how the committee would handle it.
A league is the clear best in NC play (while good this year, the B1G didn't dominate), but in league play each and every team finishes at .500. How does the committee seed these teams? Do they give the tourney winner a top seed? What about team 14? If the worst team, that had the fewest "good wins" in NC play or simply an easier league slate, finishes tied for first in the best league they can't be a poor seed.
I just think it would be amazing. A #1 seed seems out of the question when other leagues will have teams with far fewer losses. I think our league does suffer this each and every year to some extent. Teams in the B1G take losses that other leagues often don't and our best often cannot get those #1 seeds. That makes the road to a title that much tougher.
Here is my hypothetical that I wish would happen one year, just to see how the committee would handle it.
A league is the clear best in NC play (while good this year, the B1G didn't dominate), but in league play each and every team finishes at .500. How does the committee seed these teams? Do they give the tourney winner a top seed? What about team 14? If the worst team, that had the fewest "good wins" in NC play or simply an easier league slate, finishes tied for first in the best league they can't be a poor seed.
I just think it would be amazing. A #1 seed seems out of the question when other leagues will have teams with far fewer losses. I think our league does suffer this each and every year to some extent. Teams in the B1G take losses that other leagues often don't and our best often cannot get those #1 seeds. That makes the road to a title that much tougher.