gophmeister
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,204
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 38
Aside from Seantrel, who is out there still with an offer (I know all the verbals have signed)?
Seantrel Henderson
Joseph Byrd
Toby Durham
Dalvin Glass
Preston Brown
Kip Smith
Armoni Brewington
Doral Willis
Eric Dungy
Anthony Brown
Josh Huff - Oregon
Dontae Williams - San Diego St
RobDonovan Lewis - Memphis
Dominique Sanders - Houston
Antoine Lewis - Purdue
Wendell Beckwith - Tulane
Jamaine Brooks - Louisville
Corrected (7 signed, 1 offer added)
Yeah, my bad. I checked each name on rivals recruit search and some listed schools. In some cases they are signed, in others it's solid verbal.
Huff is for sure Oregon per TV, but can't find anything online.
I did not go back through your list to confirm those, you are more than capable - and I already said I made a mistake. Since I was quoted, there's no point in editing my original post.
Quit being a jerk.
ESPN already stated that Williams and Huff are signed with Oregon
Prehmmr: Dontae Williams has informed us his LOI is also in at Oregon. Again, not official until UO announces it.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/recruiting/signings/
Maybe that is official enough for you. From the players mouth.
I hate to repeat myself, but again, per Rivals, this is incorrect. None of the guys you have listed as "signed" are signed. If you have information to the contrary, like I've already asked, please cite your sources.
I don't see the point in "correcting" something that's already correct, but maybe that's just me.
Please note my earlier quote:
"If you have information to the contrary, like I've already asked, please cite your sources."
And you've done so. It's really not that hard.
And I didn't even say anything to you, so I don't know why you're getting defensive.
Please provide a link proving it's just me, I mean you. Seriously, do you want us to go back, or better yet, remember in the future, to insist on written proof for every "factual" statement? Personally, I am getting a bit tired of a few hypocrites on here (and the BB board) who try to hold other posters to standards of excellence not applied to their own posts. If this isn't you, fine, but the "cite your sources" thing, invoked as some quasi-law is wearisome unless wielded by someone who diligently follows suit. Nothing against asking for sources, but more often than not the asking is done more like insisting, or worse yet, ordering. As a famous beer drinker on TV used to say, "You're not the boss of me."
I cited my source. "Per Rivals" were the first two words in my post.
I have no problem with people updating the information, all I asked is that they use a source, not spout off the top of their heads. One poster even tried to "correct" me with Rivals information that wasn't even correct. So please read the entirety of my posts before getting all hyped up.
Thanks in advance!
You're right, dpodoll68. For now on I'll cite my sources.
1) Not necessarily, no. I asked in another thread where people are getting any number bigger than 28 (that's including Campion) and nobody has presented anything.If we've got 24 signed, doesn't that leave 3-6 more (roughly) to go? Other than SH and the short list here, there must be some unknowns being looked at. Anyone?