borninthebarn
True Believer
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
Can't be any more specific now, but he will not be our next OC.
Can't be any more specific now, but he will not be our next OC.
I have no idea who it will be. Just that it is not Heupel.
I have no special connections into the program, but have a connection to Heupel.
If this is true, it does not sound good. How do you explain to recruits and fans that you are now on your fourth choice. It appears nobody wants this job, not very attractive.
I'd take Mike Hohensee. Sign him to a 1 year contract like Cosgrove. That way if things don't work out your off the hook. If things go well I think Hohensee could stay here for a long time. With a one year contract you've got almost nothing to lose.
I am wondering if Bruininks or Maturi is behind the one year contract for Cosgrove. I don't know but am just curious if President Bruininks said "Joel, we already paying millions of dollars to several coaches between basketball and football which are not coaching here right now and we cannot risk another financial hit at this time so therefore can only do a one year deal at this time." I am sure with the government shortfall that things may be getting a little tight at the University right now from a financial standpoint.How do you sell that to recruits? They want to know who will be running the offense in the future. They do not want to commit if they have no idea who the OC is going to be after the 1 year contract. They are looking for stability also.
I am wondering if Bruininks or Maturi is behind the one year contract for Cosgrove. I don't know but am just curious if President Bruininks said "Joel, we already paying millions of dollars to several coaches between basketball and football which are not coaching here right now and we cannot risk another financial hit at this time so therefore can only do a one year deal at this time." I am sure with the government shortfall that things may be getting a little tight at the University right now from a financial standpoint.
Maturi said it was Brewster's call. You can take that as you will.
Another thing to keep in mind is that Brewster is only making $800,000 per year. He has an additional $200,000 deferred that he only gets if he makes it through year five. They have a bit of slack.
Right - and as I remember one of the local fishwraps reporting, Brewster took less with the express purpose of having more money to go out and get the assistants he wanted.![]()
Right - and as I remember one of the local fishwraps reporting, Brewster took less with the express purpose of having more money to go out and get the assistants he wanted.![]()
I am wondering if Bruininks or Maturi is behind the one year contract for Cosgrove. I don't know but am just curious if President Bruininks said "Joel, we already paying millions of dollars to several coaches between basketball and football which are not coaching here right now and we cannot risk another financial hit at this time so therefore can only do a one year deal at this time." I am sure with the government shortfall that things may be getting a little tight at the University right now from a financial standpoint.
A year-to-year contract for an OC/DC isn't rare. Roof had a similar term for his contract.
I am curious as to what other OC/DC are on a year to year contract. I know that Colorado used to have a state law where all employees wer on a year to year contract but the law was changed there recently to give exemptions to 6 or 8 university employees to have multi-year contracts which went to the football HC, basketball HC, A.D., president, etc...
Tony Dungy