Flash30
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 1,043
- Reaction score
- 125
- Points
- 63
Musselman or Hoiberg would both be good choices if they decided to come. I'd take either.
I like Hoiberg too. I think he is more realistic than Musselman.
Musselman or Hoiberg would both be good choices if they decided to come. I'd take either.
The problem I see with Hoiberg is long term program building. I would have concerns with his heart issues and his desire to do the job for 15 years plus. I am so tired of switching coaches.
15 years?! Man, you're living in the sixties. As of November 2017, there were 21 coaches in all of D1 (about 355 teams) who were at their programs for 15 years or more. Of those, 8 were at power six conference programs.
I'm not worried about 15 years. But I am concerned Hoiberg would give us 4-5 years like he did ISU and then go back to the NBA.
Here's what I don't want.
I don't want to change coaches.
I don't want 3 or more of our players to transfer out because of a coaching change.
I don't want to go backwards because of a coaching change
I don't want to have a year with under 10 wins because of a coaching change(PSU)
I don't want to start the recruiting process in MN over....
I don't want 2-3 years of rebuilding.....
I don't want to change for the sake of change.....
what I do want
Pitino to stay(in case you didn't know)![]()
Here's what I don't want.
I don't want to change coaches.
I don't want 3 or more of our players to transfer out because of a coaching change.
I don't want to go backwards because of a coaching change
I don't want to have a year with under 10 wins because of a coaching change(PSU)
I don't want to start the recruiting process in MN over....
I don't want 2-3 years of rebuilding.....
I don't want to change for the sake of change.....
what I do want
Pitino to stay(in case you didn't know)![]()
I don't think we would lose more than one to transfer -- IW. And I feel it's possible that would happen whether there is a change or not. Who else do you think might leave? I don't see any other obvious candidates.
Hire the right coach, and you wouldn't need to worry about 2-3 years of rebuilding, or going backward. Not to mention -- have we gone forward all that much, if at all, in the past six years?
I kind of agree about starting the recruiting process over. Though I don't know much about recruiting, but it doesn't seem like we have a lot to lose in 2019 recruiting. Are we considered the leader for any of the 2020 guys? Would recruiting really take that much of a hit, even in the short term? But yea, I see your point. New relationships would have to b developed.
100% agree with change for the sake of change. We've seen where that can lead. I trust Coyle to survey the landscape before actually making a move.
It can get worse...look at PSU.... IL... IndianaI want him to get it done too but curious about your point number 3, go backwards to where ? Where have we gone forward to ?
Even Ohio State has gone Backwards
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Currently 5-6 and 15-7Starting from when?
Holtmann is 20-9 in B1G play.
Matta was 18-18 his final 2 yrs in B1G play.
Currently 5-6 and 15-7
Last year 15-3 and 25-9
Seems Backwards to me
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I do trust his judgement and if he makes a move, it's with a coach or two in mind and sure he can get his man (or woman, but let's be honest)
Currently 5-6 and 15-7
Last year 15-3 and 25-9
Seems Backwards to me
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Here's what I don't want.
I don't want to change coaches.
I don't want 3 or more of our players to transfer out because of a coaching change.
I don't want to go backwards because of a coaching change
I don't want to have a year with under 10 wins because of a coaching change(PSU)
I don't want to start the recruiting process in MN over....
I don't want 2-3 years of rebuilding.....
I don't want to change for the sake of change.....
what I do want
Pitino to stay(in case you didn't know)![]()
Well, that has been tested. The San Antonio Spurs had a female assistant coach (maybe still do) and she was the head coach for their summer league team a few years back.
I'm not big on any of the names listed outside of Musselman
Saunders-Have you watched wolves? Can he recruit?
Hoiberg-Doesn't like recruiting. I would think he'd do what he did at ISU, recruit transfers
Alford-not a fan
Tony Bennet only makes 2.4 million (including bonuses). I wont put % on chances, I realize it's very low, but I wouldn't be against offering him $$$$
Steve Wojciechowski-Marquette-Can certainly pay him more than Marquette. He knows Midwest
Shaka is not really doing any better at Texas than Barnes did.
LOL. Literally. This statement is a joke, right?
By what metric is Shaka doing better than Barnes did the last few years at Texas?
LOL. Literally. This statement is a joke, right?
He isn't. The statement was so laughably bad that I can't believe he said it. Barnes went to three Elite 8s (including a Final Four) and won more than 66% of his conference games at Texas. Smart has won less than 43% of his conference games, hasn't made it out of the first round, and is barely above .500 for the season in his 4th year.
How? I suppose you can say he's doing worse? If they make it this year, that will be 3 NCAA's in 4 years. So far two first round exits.
Barnes last 4 years he made the NCAA 3 times and lost in the first round 2 out of those 3 years.
Seems pretty similar to me?
I know nuance is not your thing. But the end of Barnes tenure (which is why he got fired) and the beginning of Shaka's tenure have been similar. I think it's fairly obvious that's what I meant.
I do just fine with nuance, thanks. The comparison overall is laughably horrible, and even looking at just the last four years, it's still terrible. They're not that similar.
Barnes' last 4 years: 3 Tournament appearances, one second round appearance, 80-37 overall (.584), 35-37 conference (.486).
Smart's first almost-4 years: 2 Tournament appearances, 0 wins, 62-60 (.508), 27-36 conference (.429).
It wasn't at all obvious "that's what you meant." If you meant to say the end of Barnes' tenure (which, again, remains a terrible comparison), then say so. It isn't hard to say what you mean.