GoldenGopherTilTheEnd
Once & forever maroon and gold
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
If it was Duke, I'm just going to pretend he got called for targeting again 2X.
Can we have a moratorium on name speculation until there is an official announcement?
It isn't fair to those involved.
If it was Duke, I'm just going to pretend he got called for targeting again 2X.
So why the cloak of secrecy over these new suspensions, when Croft's suspension was made so public?
So why the cloak of secrecy over these new suspensions, when Croft's suspension was made so public?
Croft isnt suspended. He is "away from the team for personal reasons".
If I had to guess, I would say that Croft's was in the lead-up to a game, while these are during the lead-up to a bye week. For one thing, the entire staff is out on the road recruiting, and for another, there's no upcoming game compelling them to release a depth chart and to consequently explain why Player A and Player B are not on it.
Sorry, I forgot the correct terminology.
Let me try again
Why the cloak of secrecy over the new suspensions, when Croft's "away from the team for personal reasons" was made so public?
That even seems more a** backwards.
This is what internet message boards were designed for.Can we have a moratorium on name speculation until there is an official announcement?
It isn't fair to those involved.
The most amazing thing about this thread is that Coach Fleck is suspending players (or not playing them) without telling anyone why he is doing it and not one poster (so far) has whined about the lack of due process. Will wonders never cease.
+1000Actually, Sparky, neither you nor I have any idea why the players were suspended, nor what PJ said (or didn't say) to the player as to the reason for the player's suspension. It is NOT PJ's responsibility to tell you, me, or anyone else on GH WHY the player is being suspended. It's his responsibility to tell ONLY the suspended player the reason, and if he so chooses, the team. That's the "due process" in this case. Attempting to dredge up the 2016 debacle (yes, I see through your facade) and equate that with this issue is nonsensical until we know more information.
This is what internet message boards were designed for.
The most amazing thing about this thread is that Coach Fleck is suspending players (or not playing them) without telling anyone why he is doing it and not one poster (so far) has whined about the lack of due process. Will wonders never cease.
This is perfect....thread can stop hereIf it was Duke, I'm just going to pretend he got called for targeting again 2X.
We all admit we don't know why they are being suspended yet a number of folks have already concluded it was something past coaches let them get away with. Gotta love it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know something to make you think that is the case?
On a more serious note: It does seem silly to let people just endlessly speculate. That seems less fair or politically correct to the team than just addressing the transgressions and who committed them. Announce it, it's over and done. That way it's not discussed for weeks. It doesn't get legs or take on a life of it's own with wild speculation and meanwhile everybody forgets the joy of being 3 and 0. This way The PROGRAM is an afterthought...it's all negative about I heard blah blah... not 100% honest. It does not follow PJ's culture of the farmers alliance.
source says its duke you guys, which is a shame since NFL scouts were starting to call on him.
This is perfect....thread can stop here
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
It's Duke M.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Turns out it wasn't.
Pretty sure it is him.
Fleck also addressed two suspensions.
Quarterback Demry Croft, the co-starter for the season’s first two games, remains indefinitely suspended. Previously, Fleck had said Croft was away from the team because of personal issues.
Wide receiver Rashad Still, who was suspended for the Middle Tennessee game because of undisclosed disciplinary reasons, will return against Maryland.
“I’ve said it before: If you don’t do the right things, you won’t play,” Fleck said. “This is a privilege, not a right.”
When asked if there were any others who played against Middle Tennessee but won’t against Maryland, Fleck responded, “Right now, I can’t think of any.”