Time has been wasted; taxpayer; donor; deception; etc.
How much time has it cost you?
Time has been wasted; taxpayer; donor; deception; etc.
Even better: Why not admit defeat and make some real progress. Push for projects related to football and basketball - get them done for an amount that is reasonable, but aggressive. Get them done with funds from ALL your sources, not this "$190M of private funds" nonsense.
Make things happen.
They're building ahead of schedule, way before anyone thought we'd be breaking ground on a 150 million dollar project. Lumping the majority of the Athletic Department's needs into one massive project was extremely bold and took a lot of guts and vision. It also took a lot of criticism from people who thought it was ludicrous to expect that scope of a project to happen after we've struggled for years to get any facility updates.
The amount of money that has been raised, the vision of the project, all within the current accelerated timeline has been incredible in my opinion. Kudos to Teague. I'm extremely excited to watch this thing be built.
They're building ahead of schedule, way before anyone thought we'd be breaking ground on a 150 million dollar project. Lumping the majority of the Athletic Department's needs into one massive project was extremely bold and took a lot of guts and vision. It also took a lot of criticism from people who thought it was ludicrous to expect that scope of a project to happen after we've struggled for years to get any facility updates.
The amount of money that has been raised, the vision of the project, all within the current accelerated timeline has been incredible in my opinion. Kudos to Teague. I'm extremely excited to watch this thing be built.
Exactly! Thanks for quoting me. IF* things get done and the school completely flips on their "entirely funded by private donations" claim, they will have done exactly what I recommended. LATER than they should have, but still pretty good from a timing perspective compared to how long this COULD go.
Nonetheless, it's a flip flop and as I've said before I understand how that may rub some people the wrong way. It's unfortunate they need to keep changing what they've said in the past to make it work, but we knew that would be the case from day 1.
...but, I don't know what will really be said in a few weeks. Waiting.
So what you are trying to say, is you don't understand how large projects like this work. Got it.
Let me help you. This project is ahead of schedule. Costs were reduced due to great planning. And no public money is used. A giant win for everyone involved, except those who don't like the leadership at the U.
What costs were reduced and what was the great planning? (Hint: You're lying) The truth is the $190MM price tag has stayed the same (so far), but the project's scope has DECREASED in size.
Will the project be funded entirely by private donations? (Hint: Not likely)
Many large projects don't flip flop and change to this degree. Where they do run into problems is cost overruns... we'll see how that goes.
Lol I'll go make the popcornThings are often not what they seem if you accept only what you're told.
Consider what may actually be at play here and different ways of handling it. See if you don't conclude this path may be the best available.
I guess I don't understand why you care so much, even if it is a "flip-flop?" Who cares? Funding a 9 figure deal is tough. A guy might need to be a little less rigid than you expect. This isn't the Wilfs operating here, blatantly ripping off the citizens of the state.
Tomorrow could you tell us how sausage is made? Thanks.
GW is entering Tiny Territory.
![]()
Maybe even Parski territory?
Will the project be funded entirely by private donations? (Hint: Not likely)
Many large projects don't flip flop and change to this degree. Where they do run into problems is cost overruns... we'll see how that goes.
What costs were reduced and what was the great planning? (Hint: You're lying) The truth is the $190MM price tag has stayed the same (so far), but the project's scope has DECREASED in size.
Will the project be funded entirely by private donations? (Hint: Not likely)
Many large projects don't flip flop and change to this degree. Where they do run into problems is cost overruns... we'll see how that goes.
Speculation. The athletic department is planning to continue seeking donations and will pay off any borrowed funds.....which means that the plan has not "changed".
Doesn't really matter to me how the project is funded. I just want to see it built.
But if I was one of the large donors at the front end of the project, I might feel differently if the story has indeed changed. <---- (Not saying it has or has not)
If you are donating money...you want to see it built. Not wait years and feel like you could of spent the money elsewhere for something more immediate.
Perhaps....but if it was going to get built anyway through loans/public money/souvenir cups, then why would I feel good about my donation? Hard for me to say because I'm not walking in those shoes.
Perhaps....but if it was going to get built anyway through loans/public money/souvenir cups, then why would I feel good about my donation? Hard for me to say because I'm not walking in those shoes.
Gw, at the beginning of this you had a point.
You have now belabored it to the point of non-discussion.
Let it go.
The University doesn't owe me, you or anyone else not involved an explanation for their actions.
If they choose to reconfigure their plan, it's their business.
They said no public money.
Your opinion became moot at that point.
Mr. Teague and everyone involved in this deserve nothing but accolades at this point.
Indeed they do owe people an explanation for their actions. You can pretend that taxpayers haven't given money to the athletic department, but they have (not talking about this project).
Let's see where things go.
And if I had been told "this will be entirely funded by private donations" (as I have been told) and then gave money based in part on that, and then the story changed.. you're damn right they owe me an explanation.
Indeed they do owe people an explanation for their actions. You can pretend that taxpayers haven't given money to the athletic department, but they have (not talking about this project).
Let's see where things go.
And if I had been told "this will be entirely funded by private donations" (as I have been told) and then gave money based in part on that, and then the story changed.. you're damn right they owe me an explanation.
Indeed they do owe people an explanation for their actions. You can pretend that taxpayers haven't given money to the athletic department, but they have (not talking about this project).
Let's see where things go.
And if I had been told "this will be entirely funded by private donations" (as I have been told) and then gave money based in part on that, and then the story changed.. you're damn right they owe me an explanation.
And if I had been told "this will be entirely funded by private donations" (as I have been told) and then gave money based in part on that, and then the story changed.. you're damn right they owe me an explanation.
First off, I haven't seen anyone thank you yet....so thank you!
Second, please let us know what they tell you.