SelectionSunday
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 24,702
- Reaction score
- 4,848
- Points
- 113
here's my proposal for basketball. I would be in favor of doing something similar to what the Big East does. Year to year it varies which teams you play once or twice. An educated guess at which teams are going to be strong, middle of the pack, bottom-feeders, etc., is made every offseason by the coaches/AD's, etc. Then they go from there and determine each team's conference schedule.
To that end, like the Big East, I'd go with no divisions for basketball. The Big Ten would be able to maintain playing 18 conference games instead of going back to 16, which is the likelihood if the Big Ten goes to divisional scheduling.
Play 7 teams twice.
Play 4 teams once.
That guarantees you play every team at least once, and means there are only 2 opponents the season-ticket holders won't get to see in their home arena.
With Tubby's scheduling history, please Big Ten I beg of you, don't go back to a 16-game conference schedule.
To that end, like the Big East, I'd go with no divisions for basketball. The Big Ten would be able to maintain playing 18 conference games instead of going back to 16, which is the likelihood if the Big Ten goes to divisional scheduling.
Play 7 teams twice.
Play 4 teams once.
That guarantees you play every team at least once, and means there are only 2 opponents the season-ticket holders won't get to see in their home arena.
With Tubby's scheduling history, please Big Ten I beg of you, don't go back to a 16-game conference schedule.