Who is the nation's most underrated coach? (from Rivals.com)

fan of Ray Williams

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
11,742
Reaction score
7,043
Points
113
http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1103570&utm_source=bleacherreport.com Mike Huguenin's answer:
Had he not spent the vast majority of his coaching career in one city (Philadelphia), I think a heck of a lot more people would know how great Fran Dunphy is as a coach. He has rebuilt Temple into a program to be reckoned with -- both in the Atlantic 10 and nationally -- and has guided the Owls to three consecutive 20-win seasons. Before his stint at Temple, he was coach for 17 seasons at Penn and led the Quakers to nine 20-win seasons and nine NCAA tourney appearances. Penn finished lower than third in the league just once in Dunphy's tenure. Dunphy, 61, also has been an assistant at La Salle, his alma mater. His teams always are fundamentally sound and play solid defense. He doesn't get high school All-Americans; instead, he finds guys (a lot of city kids, not surprisingly) who fit his style of play. Dunphy has 394 career wins. Unlike a lot of top-tier coaches, Dunphy isn't just a basketball guy. He teaches an honors-level class on management in Temple's business school and also served as a lecturer in Penn's prestigious Wharton School of Business when he was Quakers coach.

Jason King's answer:
I don't think USC coach Kevin O'Neill receives nearly enough credit. In recent years, he's done a phenomenal job with terrible situations. He helped Arizona keep its NCAA tournament streak alive in 2008 after taking over on an interim basis for Lute Olson. Most teams would've floundered under such adverse conditions -- Olson took a leave of absence at the beginning of the season and did not return -- but O'Neill handled it like a pro. After spending a year as an assistant with the NBA's Memphis Grizzlies, O'Neill returned to college coaching last year at USC. Almost all of the players recruited by the previous staff went elsewhere, and O.J. Mayo and Taj Gibson turned pro. Still, even with a cast of basketball vagabonds, O'Neill led his team to a top 25 ranking in January. The Trojans were in the Pac-10 title hunt until the final few weeks of the season. USC will only get better under O'Neill.

Steve Megargee's answer:
Before Old Dominion upset Notre Dame in the first round of the most recent NCAA tournament, most casual fans outside the Mid-Atlantic region probably couldn't have named the Monarchs' coach even if you offered them 10 guesses. Now that he's finally won an NCAA tourney game, perhaps Blaine Taylor should receive some overdue recognition. Old Dominion has won at least 24 games in five of the last six seasons and has earned NCAA bids in three of those years. Before going to ODU, Taylor led Montana to two NCAA tournament berths in his seven-year stint. Taylor never has coached a player who was selected in the NBA draft, yet he still has more than 300 career wins and has won nearly two-thirds of his games. That kind of track record deserves more attention.
I'll throw in Ben Jacobson from UNI
 

and has guided the Owls to three consecutive 20-win seasons

Pshaw, that's all that Dunphy has done? That's nothing.

I wonder if Temple's fans are taking to their message boards and decrying the state of the program considering that meager accomplishment.
 

its pretty obvious Brad Stevens is the most underrated. A nobody turned into a house hold name. Only a great coach could lead a mid major to a NC game.
 


http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1103570&utm_source=bleacherreport.com Mike Huguenin's answer:
Had he not spent the vast majority of his coaching career in one city (Philadelphia), I think a heck of a lot more people would know how great Fran Dunphy is as a coach. He has rebuilt Temple into a program to be reckoned with -- both in the Atlantic 10 and nationally -- and has guided the Owls to three consecutive 20-win seasons. Before his stint at Temple, he was coach for 17 seasons at Penn and led the Quakers to nine 20-win seasons and nine NCAA tourney appearances. Penn finished lower than third in the league just once in Dunphy's tenure. Dunphy, 61, also has been an assistant at La Salle, his alma mater. His teams always are fundamentally sound and play solid defense. He doesn't get high school All-Americans; instead, he finds guys (a lot of city kids, not surprisingly) who fit his style of play. Dunphy has 394 career wins. Unlike a lot of top-tier coaches, Dunphy isn't just a basketball guy. He teaches an honors-level class on management in Temple's business school and also served as a lecturer in Penn's prestigious Wharton School of Business when he was Quakers coach.

Jason King's answer:
I don't think USC coach Kevin O'Neill receives nearly enough credit. In recent years, he's done a phenomenal job with terrible situations. He helped Arizona keep its NCAA tournament streak alive in 2008 after taking over on an interim basis for Lute Olson. Most teams would've floundered under such adverse conditions -- Olson took a leave of absence at the beginning of the season and did not return -- but O'Neill handled it like a pro. After spending a year as an assistant with the NBA's Memphis Grizzlies, O'Neill returned to college coaching last year at USC. Almost all of the players recruited by the previous staff went elsewhere, and O.J. Mayo and Taj Gibson turned pro. Still, even with a cast of basketball vagabonds, O'Neill led his team to a top 25 ranking in January. The Trojans were in the Pac-10 title hunt until the final few weeks of the season. USC will only get better under O'Neill.

Steve Megargee's answer:
Before Old Dominion upset Notre Dame in the first round of the most recent NCAA tournament, most casual fans outside the Mid-Atlantic region probably couldn't have named the Monarchs' coach even if you offered them 10 guesses. Now that he's finally won an NCAA tourney game, perhaps Blaine Taylor should receive some overdue recognition. Old Dominion has won at least 24 games in five of the last six seasons and has earned NCAA bids in three of those years. Before going to ODU, Taylor led Montana to two NCAA tournament berths in his seven-year stint. Taylor never has coached a player who was selected in the NBA draft, yet he still has more than 300 career wins and has won nearly two-thirds of his games. That kind of track record deserves more attention.
I'll throw in Ben Jacobson from UNI

Jason King misunderstood. Kevin O'Neill is (perhaps) the most OVERRATED coach in Div I.
 


Jason King misunderstood. Kevin O'Neill is (perhaps) the most OVERRATED coach in Div I.

Yeah.. I don't see O'Neill belonging anywhere on that list. I have mixed feelings on the guy, I guess, but he did help us to the Sweet Sixteen... the win over Kentucky (and the celebration on campus afterward) is still one of my favorite college bball memories.

I enjoyed this 'most underrated' article more... Jimmy getting his props. Well deserved.
 

Absolutely. Two 30+ W seasons in last 3 years. AT BUTLER!
Brad Stevens has averaged 29.67 per year in his 3 years, while Butler was averaged 23 wins per year for the past 15 years.

Lets assume he is, doesn't that suggest the "best" coach is worth a 6 to 7 game delta over the average?
 

Brad Stevens has averaged 29.67 per year in his 3 years, while Butler was averaged 23 wins per year for the past 15 years.

Lets assume he is, doesn't that suggest the "best" coach is worth a 6 to 7 game delta over the average?

I understand the point you're trying to make, but from a logical argument standpoint, no, that would not at all suggest the "best" coach is worth a 6 to 7 game delta over the average.

Nonetheless, the suggestion that Stevens is the most underrated coach is a bit silly. Butler has had a very fine program for years. If I recall correctly, Stevens stepped in as head coach for a guy that had just been named the National Coach of the Year.

Not to mention.. for 2009-10, Butler was ranked #10 and #11 in the Coaches and AP preseason polls, respectively.

Sure, they are from a less reputable conference and made it to the national championship game, but this is a program that recently had a National Coach of the Year and came into the season ranked #10/#11 -- that doesn't scream underrated to me.
 

Stew Morrill, Utah State? 11 straight years of 23 or more wins. (miserable post season tourney record though, which probably excludes him)
 



Stew Morrill, Utah State? 11 straight years of 23 or more wins. (miserable post season tourney record though, which probably excludes him)

He's definitely gotta be up there in the discussion. I was terrified of playing them in the tourney in 2009 and we barely won, thanks in large part to the TWolves' Lazar Hayward.

Before that game, Buzz Williams was asked about the uniqueness of Utah State:

"Q. Talk about Utah State and all the set plays that they run, if you have seen anything close to that either in your league play or even non conference play throughout the season.

COACH WILLIAMS: Completely unequivocally no, we haven't seen anything like it. I think Utah State, one of the reasons why they're the fifth winningest program since 2000 is because of their style of play. A lot of that has to do with Coach Morrill's talent as a coach, but it also has to do with their ability to recruit players that can fit completely into what they do. Because he hasn't changed. I don't think that in the time that I've known Coach that's changed in what he does.

They're very efficient, obviously they have won 30 games, that's second in the country, and they make 50 percent of their shots. So to an extent it's a little bit of a math problem, in that the 86 games that Coach Morrill has lost in the last ten years, 70 of those 86 games he hasn't scored 72 points. In the games that he has scored 72 points or more, this year, they have won 30. In the games that they haven't scored 72, they have lost four. And so from a mathematical point of view, they want to be on offense two times per game minute and if they can do that, they're going to win.

Their set plays, I don't know that any team and I've watched every WAC opponent that they have played, I don't know that any team can completely absorb what they do and all of their sets. And because none of it, none of their calls are verbal, they're all coming from either the placebo card or either Tim's holding the real card or the placebo card, I think the only person that knows which one is the real card is the players and the trainer who is monitoring the efficiency of it. I haven't been able to figure that out.

But you can't worry about or try to absorb completely all of their sets, particularly in a short preparation time, I think that the things that you have to prepare for are their actions. Cross screen, down screen, back screen, UCLA screen, things like that. Because those are core to what they do, no matter what the set is. I think where they're really efficient is not only in their sets, but the counters to those sets. They run one play that is a core thing that they do and they have five counters to that one play. So as a coach, do you call that one play or do you call that six plays? Because as a player you call it six plays because it's six different things that you have to remember.

So we played 18 opponents, obviously in the Big East 15 of them were different. So there were 15 scouts, none of those scouts are unique or comparatively like Utah State. It's unlike any other scout and I think that that's, when you're playing games two games a week in league play, that's really, really hard to prepare your team for Utah State. And it's been difficult to prepare our team for them. Our guys have done a great job of absorbing it, but it's a unique scout for sure."
 






Top Bottom