Bad Gopher
A Loner, A Rebel
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 24,168
- Reaction score
- 13,007
- Points
- 113
I would concur with what Selection Sunday said. A coach who values consistency of effort.
Medium and old timers, do this thought experiment. Clem Haskins is the coach. Think of the lazy-assed passes that Gach and Carr have made recently. Do you think they would see the court again for the rest of the game?
I remember a game around 1994--pre-season tournament. I can't remember what the player might have done (or not done) out there, but when he got back to the bench, Clem turned his back on the game and gave that player his undivided attention, talking to him for what must have been the better part of a minute. Totally ignored the game that was being played because he wanted to take that opportunity to coach that guy. He wanted to deliver the message immediately rather than wait til practice or whenever--because, who knows, it might make a difference in that game (which they won, over a top-ranked team).There is a built-in tension for a coach when trying to create a culture. Players need to be developed, (mostly in practice), and then pushed to execute during the game. If someone continues to step outside the plan, or the values of the new culture, it should affect their playing time. The other side of the coin, the player shouldn't be looking over their shoulder, expecting to get pulled after a stupid foul or a traveling call. There's the tension; lettem play, or pullem after a mistake. If a player consistently chooses to force up contested shots when there is an open man, he sits. If he travels, or misses an open shot.... play on. The coach that can't tell the difference shouldn't be our coach.
That contrasts with what I see coaches do too often: yank the guy off the court and angrily ignore him.