It's a university tradition to reward mediocrity and on top of that, they'll be thinking about how great Tubby was at one time and as a result, will also be thinking how lucky we are that he graces us with his presence.
We are at the bottom of the Conference for the second straight year
Ski U Mah Gopher said:I thought Kaler said no extensions until there is an AD.
He said just during the season. AD didn't matter.
I'm absolutely shocked at the amount of responses that Tubby should be extended. We are 2-11 in our last 13 home games....Despicable! We are at the bottom of the Conference for the second straight year and it will be 2 years in a row without an NCAA birth. Attendance levels are way down at Williams Arena and we have lost multiple, key players to transfers...all of which are having great success at their new schools, more success than they ever had as Gophers. His half court offense is mind numbingly horrific and we struggle to make important adjustments during games...I.e. Breaking down zone defenses against Iowa and Northwestern. Why on Earth is he deserving of an extension? People are so blinded by the Tubby Smith name it's ridiculous. Kaler would be a fool to extend Tubby.
False.
Insert the word "near". Does that help you out, make you feel better?
It's not about my feelings, it's about being accurate.
Or, is it?
An extension would be insane unless there are big staff changes to go with it. Right now the customers who buy seats will not buy into an extension of Tubby and the status quo.
Staff changes are window dressing. It all comes from the top.
There are no good solutions to this mess. So what is the least bad solution? I think that Kaler arranges a buyout and hires Flip. (I never, ever thought I would advocate hiring Flip. Never....ever.) If Kaler opts for that approach, he takes a short term PR hit, the legislature yells for a couple of days (they don't fund much of the U anymore anyway) and he leaves himself open to the valid charge that a university president has better things to do than fire and hire b-ball coaches. Under this scenario I would advocate for Flip because he can, with credibility, walk into both Tyus' and Rashard's living rooms and tell them that he can get them to the NBA if they do what he tells them to do. Plus, Flip really can coach and wants the job. If Kaler extends Tubby or waits for the new AD which effectively kills any chance of getting Tyus and Rashard, gopher hoops is set back another 7-10 years, revenue drops, the premium seating campaign is a disaster and no new facilities.
As dumb as this sounds in a perfect world if I were Kaler I would tell Tubby to sign either combination in the spring signing period or your gone:
1. Five star recruit+another three star
2. Two four star recruits
Of course not happening.
I take it you didn't read the poll or the follow up post. The poll asks what you think Kaler will do, not what you think he should do. BIG DIFFERENCE, no?
Staff changes are window dressing. It all comes from the top.
There are no good solutions to this mess. So what is the least bad solution? I think that Kaler arranges a buyout and hires Flip. (I never, ever thought I would advocate hiring Flip. Never....ever.) If Kaler opts for that approach, he takes a short term PR hit, the legislature yells for a couple of days (they don't fund much of the U anymore anyway) and he leaves himself open to the valid charge that a university president has better things to do than fire and hire b-ball coaches. Under this scenario I would advocate for Flip because he can, with credibility, walk into both Tyus' and Rashard's living rooms and tell them that he can get them to the NBA if they do what he tells them to do. Plus, Flip really can coach and wants the job. If Kaler extends Tubby or waits for the new AD which effectively kills any chance of getting Tyus and Rashard, gopher hoops is set back another 7-10 years, revenue drops, the premium seating campaign is a disaster and no new facilities.
I agree, the fact that Tubby Smith would need to be told in year five that staff changes need to be made may be a worse indictment than straight out firing him.Staff changes are window dressing. It all comes from the top.
There are no good solutions to this mess. So what is the least bad solution? I think that Kaler arranges a buyout and hires Flip. (I never, ever thought I would advocate hiring Flip. Never....ever.) If Kaler opts for that approach, he takes a short term PR hit, the legislature yells for a couple of days (they don't fund much of the U anymore anyway) and he leaves himself open to the valid charge that a university president has better things to do than fire and hire b-ball coaches. Under this scenario I would advocate for Flip because he can, with credibility, walk into both Tyus' and Rashard's living rooms and tell them that he can get them to the NBA if they do what he tells them to do. Plus, Flip really can coach and wants the job. If Kaler extends Tubby or waits for the new AD which effectively kills any chance of getting Tyus and Rashard, gopher hoops is set back another 7-10 years, revenue drops, the premium seating campaign is a disaster and no new facilities.