RoyalGopher
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2010
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
How much more undpredictable and lousy could either the gophers or vikings be?
I'd say that when the Gophers are lousy, their lousiness is more predictable than the Vikings' lousiness. The Vikings always find new and fascinating ways to suck and/or blow it. When the Gophs suck, it's with quiet Midwestern reserve. Heck, they even managed to win their last two games. On the one hand, it lacks that train-wreck fascination to make it more interesting. On the other hand, it's a good deal less undignified.
The Gophers came on at the end of the season and beat 2 teams with winning records, the Vikings have quit and have yet to beat a team with a winning record. Easy answer, I'll take the Gophers any day.
I'd say that when the Gophers are lousy, their lousiness is more predictable than the Vikings' lousiness. The Vikings always find new and fascinating ways to suck and/or blow it. When the Gophs suck, it's with quiet Midwestern reserve. Heck, they even managed to win their last two games. On the one hand, it lacks that train-wreck fascination to make it more interesting. On the other hand, it's a good deal less undignified.
Go back to October 10, 2003, and see if you still agree with this comment...
Nothing about an NFL Football game, its teams, or its players reminds me of anything associated with College Football.
The NFL has boosters?
not smart enough to figure out what I am implying?