Tubby takes a tough tone when describing Damian's play as of late

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
62,202
Reaction score
18,762
Points
113
"Damian was just fouling guys," Smith said. "It was just poor defensive position, and he did that in the Ohio State game. He did it in the Michigan State game. We work on it every day. I don't know whether it's something he's been doing all along and now it caught up with him. He's got to stop reaching and play smart, sound basketball. And if he's not defending, he's no offensive juggernaut, so we have a problem there."

http://www.twincities.com/gophers/ci_11692051?nclick_check=1

Go Gophers!!
 

I like it! Damian is a leader of this team...if he's not producing, he is hurting our team. Hopefully he responds the right way.
 

Tough to criticize DJ's defense when watching some of the other guys out there. IMO Westbrook has shown the least out of any Gopher on the defensive end. He is lazy getting back and is always out of position when his man is without the ball. Plus, he hasn't been much of an offensive juggernaut lately either.
 

I was surprised by how much Johnson struggled Tuesday night. I hadn't noticed it as much on the last road games simply because they were on TV and the camera often doesn't give as much perspective.

The link to the story didn't work for me ... I'm assuming that Tubby was responding to a question as opposed to independently shining the light on Damian? Or was Tubby resorting to a bit of public goading to light a fire under Johnson? Seems a bit out of character for Tubby to initiate a quote like that aimed at an individual player (but he's done so to the team or the starters as a whole).
 

Probably more of responding to a question --

Tubby Smith doesn't have a go-to guy, and it worries him.

"Absolutely," he said.

Some teams the University of Minnesota will face in the last six games of the Big Ten Conference men's basketball season will have two or three players to rely on for consistent offense. He is still searching for one.

"I don't know, maybe it's because people are taking certain things away from us," said Smith, who takes the Gophers (19-5, 7-5) on the road Saturday to play Penn State (17-8, 6-6) in State College, Pa. "When you're not making shots, and you let it affect other parts of your game, I can't go with you very long."

The lack of a consistent scorer has become a growing concern, as the Gophers have lost four of their past seven games. They escaped with a 62-54 victory Tuesday at home against the Big Ten's worst team, Indiana, thanks to 26 forced turnovers and sophomore forward Paul Carter's career-best 22 points off the bench.

Carter was the sixth different player to lead the team in scoring in the past seven games.

Minnesota's top three scorers — Lawrence Westbrook, Damian Johnson and Al Nolen — combined to score eight points on 2-for-16 shooting Tuesday. Westbrook, the team's leading scorer this season at 12.7 points a game, has scored fewer than double figures in three straight games.

"He tried some bad shots inside that he should have passed," Smith said of Westbrook. "He drove it to the basket against three or four guys, and you have to pass


the ball. When you do that now, those bad shots are turnovers, and we just can't live with that."
Westbrook and Johnson combined to shoot 0 for 11 against the Hoosiers. But Johnson also had as many fouls (four) as field-goal attempts.

"Damian was just fouling guys," Smith said. "It was just poor defensive position, and he did that in the Ohio State game. He did it in the Michigan State game. We work on it every day. I don't know whether it's something he's been doing all along and now it caught up with him. He's got to stop reaching and play smart, sound basketball. And if he's not defending, he's no offensive juggernaut, so we have a problem there."

With an athletic 6-foot-8, 195-pound frame, Carter is similar to Johnson in that he uses his quickness and athleticism to play more of a defensive role, but he also displayed a well-rounded offensive game Tuesday.

Carter, who averages 7.2 points a game in Big Ten play, showed three-point range. He finished strong with three dunks, one on a fast-break alley-oop pass from Johnson. He also made 7 of 8 free throws.

The Gophers obviously were trying to establish Carter as an offensive threat late against Indiana. He finished shooting 7 for 13 from the field, 6 for 7 in the second half. Nobody else on the team attempted more than three shots in the second half.

"Westbrook, Al and Damian, we always turn to those guys, but some nights it doesn't go their way," Carter said. "Coaches were just telling me to take my time, to go out there and just play. My teammates were telling me the same. In the end, it was just really them getting me the ball on open cuts."

Who will step up next for the Gophers?

Sophomore Blake Hoffarber had his first double-figure game in conference play with 19 points, behind six second-half three-pointers, in a 64-58 loss at Ohio State last weekend. But he had two points on 1-for-4 shooting Tuesday.

Earlier this season, Nolen looked like he could become a breakout player for the Gophers. But the sophomore point guard has not scored in double figures for five straight games while shooting a combined 7 for 23 from the field.

Freshman Devoe Joseph had a team-high 11 points on 5-for-8 shooting in an embarrassing 76-47 loss at Michigan State on Feb. 4, but that's his only double-figure-scoring game in the Big Ten.

Joseph's solution for Nolen is to force turnovers, allowing him to get out and run.

"I think that's when we're at our best," he said. "Then we can get out on the break where (Nolen) can get layups and we can all be in transition."
 


>>And if he's not defending, he's no offensive juggernaut, so we have a problem there."<<

Was Tubby prepping fans for Carter to replace Johnson? IMO, the two play the same position and Carter's the hotter player right now.
 

I don't necessarily think Carter and Johnson play the same position. They are both forwards, but IMO, our best lineup features both of them together. I would even go so far as to say they are probably our 2 most important players as of this moment.
 

I believe Johnson, as both a vet and a seemingly coachable guy, will take this to heart. I look for immediate improvement out of him.
 

Maroon,

They're both natural 3's, almost identical physically. Skills are slightly different. Just my opinion, of course. We're a better team if we have a more appropriate, more physical player at 4... which we probably don't have right now. Yes, we could play two 3's at a time, but that puts a lot of pressure on a freshman 5 to clear the boards and enforce the lane.
 



Maroon,

They're both natural 3's, almost identical physically. Skills are slightly different. Just my opinion, of course. We're a better team if we have a more appropriate, more physical player at 4... which we probably don't have right now. Yes, we could play two 3's at a time, but that puts a lot of pressure on a freshman 5 to clear the boards and enforce the lane.

Yea they do pretty much play the same position, but I still like seeing them on the court together. Like you said, we don't have that physical 4, and I think playing Carter and DJ at the same time as the 3 and 4 is better than playing Colt and Ralph at the same time at 4 and 5 with DJ at the three. I think we need an athletic scorer amongst the bigs in the starting lineup.
 

I believe DJ is the embodiment of all the Gopher strengths and weaknesses. On a team that prides itself in deflections, he's the leader. He's also the leader in blocked shots. On the other hand, he also embodies the Gopher's lack of perimeter shooting and is a well below average rebounder from the PF spot.

I suppose that when Tubby is taking exception with DJs defense, he is also speaking to the rest of the team that even their best defender is not above criticism.
 

Mikie, I like your quote:

I suppose that when Tubby is taking exception with DJs defense, he is also speaking to the rest of the team that even their best defender is not above criticism.

One of the best ways to get the attention of the entire team, is to publicly chastise the team's leader. I know from experience, as I did that when coaching, but I will bet a dollar to a donut that Tubby discussed it with DJ first, to let DJ know that if he did this, how would DJ take it? It works. DJ probably said..."Do It, Coach. Let's wake the boys up!" That is what my leader did when I talked to him about a situation like this. DJ is prime time....
 

>>DJ is prime time...<<

All-conference first team on defense, I'm guessing. I just wish he was a more dependable scorer.
 



G4L,

I can appreciate your view that they are both ideally 3s. The problem is, we don't really have the physical 4 you're speaking of. In fact, I would say that the main reason they should be on the floor at the same time is that Carter most closely resembles the physical 4 man we need. He is clearly our best rebounder and his athleticism at that spot provides something we don't get from our freshman big men. I don't see lane enforcement being a problem either way since both DJ and Carter are solid shot blockers. You have to find a way to get your best players on the floor.
 

This team is completely lacking an offensive identity. A big reason why is that every combination is completely different and our best group is somewhat strange. Sampson is a better 4 that post, but forced to play the post. DJ and Carter are not 4's, but we really don't have a true one, as Sampson is really a hybrid even if iverson was ready to hold down the post at this point. Our SG position is smallish which creates negative mismatches at times. And Al while doing a nice job still hasn't learned how to control the offense. And every sub, completely changes the strenght of the team, which would be good if you had a strong base. but since we don't it just adds to the disarray. It's just a bit of a mess.

I had hoped that along the course of the season a starting group would emerge and the rest would find their roles, and give a full arsenal of weapons for Tubby's disposal. As of yet it just hasn't happened. I still hope for some sense to emerge, but we're running out of time.
 




Top Bottom