Unregistered User
Wild animal with a keyboard
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 15,395
- Reaction score
- 5,793
- Points
- 113
We have pretty similar rankingsInteresting activity
Post quiz rankings: (who I would have)
1) Oregon
2) texas
3) penn state
4) SMU (Ohio State)
5) Georgia
6) Ohio State (Notre dame)
7) Boise state (smu)
8) Indiana
9) notre Dame (Tennessee)
10) Tennessee (Boise)
11) army (Miami)
12) Alabama (South Carolina)
13) Miami (Alabama)
14) Clemson (Ole Miss)
15) South Carolina (Arizona State)
I think bad losses and number of losses are the first factors for me.
The thing about me is that not everyone gets to go 3-2 against top 5 teams. So it’s not really fair.We have pretty similar rankings
yep agreed. to me it's essentially a banded losses. not fair to punish a team simply because you don't know how they would've done when you have the result of how a team did. if they're the same number of losses or equal numbers of bad losses (or the same "type of losses" as in both to top 10 teams or something), the rest of the SOS gets more weight. Nice wins look great to inflate you against teams with equal losses but when you only play a very finite number of games, having an extra loss (especially if they're bad) is huge and those losses by ole miss and Bama are the definition of bad losses. I have S Car just below both Bama and Ole Miss because H2H when same # of losses is my first separation point even though the result may be different now with healthy Sellers and their season improvement. In reality, none of the 3 of them should get in to me and you have enough other 2 loss teams to be fine with getting them in.The thing about me is that not everyone gets to go 3-2 against top 5 teams. So it’s not really fair.
What is more impressive:
Illinois going 0-2 vs top 4 teams and 9-1 against others
Or
Ole Miss going 2-0 vs top 15 teams but 7-3 against everyone else.
If Illinois played Ole Miss’s schedule you could make the argument they’d go 9-3
If ole Miss played Illinois’s schedule, you could make the argument they’d go 9-3.
So my solution is to send 10-2 Miami.
Miami is 10-2 Vs the types of teams ole miss was 7-3 against. And is 10-2 against the teams Illinois was 9-1 against.
Miami lost by 5 to a team that took Georgia to overtime x5
Miami lost by 4 to a team that’s probably going to be about 25 tonight.
Miami beat a Florida team that ole miss lost to.
Miami beat a Louisville team that just embarrassed a Kentucky team that ole miss lost to.
That doesn’t answer the Miami vs Alabama question. I don’t understand how anyone could rank ole Miss above Miami.
Ole Miss lost to 7-5 Florida, 4-8 Kentucky, 8-4 LSU
Alabama lost to 6-6 Vanderbilt and 6-6 Oklahoma
You can’t tell me those teams would definitely go 10-2 vs Miami schedule
Which is why I have South Carolina higher than both of them too.
The quality wins argument only works with me if you don’t have bad losses