Winnipegopher
Wag more, bark less
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,587
- Reaction score
- 113
- Points
- 63
Have been thinking about this since the McGhee hit.
If we have entered a new reality and come to agreement that the game will have to change to limit head shots (I think we have), do we then not need to start thinking about systematic changes to the game to limit injuries?
I wonder if we are on the road to prohibiting plays, primarily throws over the middle of less than 15-20 yards, that lead to head shots. If you look at the McGhee hit on Carr (and Poock's and Rallis'), it is by nature a dangerous play to throw the ball over the middle. The defender and the receiver are both put in jeopardy. As Sawvel noted, they either hit with the facemask or go low and risk injury. Conversely the defensive player risks getting head shots as well. If the defender's slow to the collision, the wr has the opportunity to lay a big hit on the defender.
Long story short- are we a year or so away from developing rules that prohibits dangerous throws? If so, how would that be articulated as a rule?
If we have entered a new reality and come to agreement that the game will have to change to limit head shots (I think we have), do we then not need to start thinking about systematic changes to the game to limit injuries?
I wonder if we are on the road to prohibiting plays, primarily throws over the middle of less than 15-20 yards, that lead to head shots. If you look at the McGhee hit on Carr (and Poock's and Rallis'), it is by nature a dangerous play to throw the ball over the middle. The defender and the receiver are both put in jeopardy. As Sawvel noted, they either hit with the facemask or go low and risk injury. Conversely the defensive player risks getting head shots as well. If the defender's slow to the collision, the wr has the opportunity to lay a big hit on the defender.
Long story short- are we a year or so away from developing rules that prohibits dangerous throws? If so, how would that be articulated as a rule?