BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,807
- Reaction score
- 17,755
- Points
- 113
per Tanick:
The termination also may transgress the First Amendment right of freedom of speech, which applies to public sector employees like Claeys. While the right of free expression does not immunize insubordinate behavior, the supposed reason for the discharge, the rubric of insubordination cannot be used to sanction constitutionally protected expression that is not disruptive or malicious.
Armed with these potent legal claims, Claeys may be able to obtain a much larger amount from the “U” than the half-million it owes him under his current contract. Added to the costs of paying off his assistant coaches, who also will probably be leaving, and then hiring a new, higher-salaried coach and assistants, the university could end up spending into eight figures, in excess of $10 million.
That’s a high price to pay to suppress freedom of speech.
http://www.startribune.com/u-s-firi...n-and-potentially-expensive-lesson/409711395/
Go Gophers!!
The termination also may transgress the First Amendment right of freedom of speech, which applies to public sector employees like Claeys. While the right of free expression does not immunize insubordinate behavior, the supposed reason for the discharge, the rubric of insubordination cannot be used to sanction constitutionally protected expression that is not disruptive or malicious.
Armed with these potent legal claims, Claeys may be able to obtain a much larger amount from the “U” than the half-million it owes him under his current contract. Added to the costs of paying off his assistant coaches, who also will probably be leaving, and then hiring a new, higher-salaried coach and assistants, the university could end up spending into eight figures, in excess of $10 million.
That’s a high price to pay to suppress freedom of speech.
http://www.startribune.com/u-s-firi...n-and-potentially-expensive-lesson/409711395/
Go Gophers!!