STrib: Underage Gopher football recruit involved in alleged sexual misconduct

Donate To GopherHole
BleedGopher

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
63,793
Reaction score
22,214
Points
113
per Brandon:

An underage football recruit was involved in the alleged sexual misconduct on Sept. 2 that led to the suspension of 10 University of Minnesota players, according to police records, court testimony and a university report.

The recruit acknowledged having sex with the woman early that morning, but denied raping her, according to a police report.

In court testimony and police interviews, the alleged victim, a student at the university, alleged that the recruit and at least a dozen other men raped her. The Hennepin County attorney’s office announced in October that there would be no charges in the case.

As part of the school policy for student-athlete visits, the university has a prohibition against the “use of sexual activity as a recruiting device.”

University spokesman Evan Lapiska said the recruit’s involvement was not reported to either the NCAA or the Big Ten because the school does not believe that a rule violation occurred.

http://www.startribune.com/underage...olved-in-alleged-sexual-misconduct/407140326/

Go Gophers!!
 

Underage for what? Nice click bait. The fact that it's a recruit is a big deal. Using that term is a weak attempt to further sensationalize this mess.
 



skauma said:
Well, no one in this case is facing time in jail. But, why do you think the woman should be?
Click to expand...

She knowingly had sex with a DRUNK underage guy (with a smelly penis). If the roles were reversed and a 21 year old guy had sex with a drunk 17 year old female recruit, the police would see this differently. Double standards abound.
 


It depends how old she was. Per the law as I understand it if she was 4 yrs older than the recruit it is rape.
 

csom_1991 said:
She knowingly had sex with a DRUNK underage guy (with a smelly penis). If the roles were reversed and a 21 year old guy had sex with a drunk 17 year old female recruit, the police would see this differently. Double standards abound.
Click to expand...

So, what about the 5 male students who also were involved in sexual activity with the under-aged male?

Still want to talk about double standards?
 

skauma said:
So, what about the 5 male students who also were involved in sexual activity with the under-aged male?

Still want to talk about double standards?
Click to expand...

I hope you're joking. You've really gone off the deep end.
 




skauma said:
So, what about the 5 male students who also were involved in sexual activity with the under-aged male
Click to expand...

I didn't read anything about guy on guy action - maybe you have a different report. Did A5,6,7,10, or 12 comment on the smell of the recruit's penis and I missed it?
 

csom_1991 said:
I didn't read anything about guy on guy action - maybe you have a different report. Did A5,6,7,10, or 12 comment on the smell of the recruit's penis and I missed it?
Click to expand...

You missed where recruit was having sex with her while DJam was having his dick sucked? DJam completely naked in a room with a completely naked under aged person while both being aroused?

DJam and 4 other players were involved in an orgy with an under aged person, but only the girl deserves to go to jail because she was the one penetrated?

What is the point of you bringing penis smell up?
 

skauma said:
You missed where recruit was having sex with her while DJam was having his dick sucked? DJam completely naked in a room with a completely naked under aged person while both being aroused?
Click to expand...

Djam never had sexual contact with the recruit. Being naked in the same room with another guy is not illegal or showers would be banned. Under no law would Djam ever be punished for his sexual conduct w/ the recruit - other than something along the lines of enabling the delinquency of a minor. On the other hand, the recruit would have an air-tight case against the female as he was underage and DRUNK. So, he could not give consent even if he wanted to. Don't know why this is so hard for you to understand.
 

underaged male involved in orgy with 5 other men.

Yep, Im sure only the girl can be guilty there.

An orgy isnt a shower, as locker room showers arent meant to be sexual...an orgy however...
 



skauma said:
An orgy isnt a shower, as locker room showers arent meant to be sexual...an orgy however...
Click to expand...

There is nothing there. If you are shopping for a charge - and I don't know why the police did not pursue this - it would be against Djam for producing, possessing, and distributing child pornography.
 

^you were the one shopping for a charge. I was showing you how it was ambiguous....

i.e. The girl had sex with an underaged male, she needs to go to jail!!!

Sure, its true that an underaged male penetrated her, but its also true that 5 other, not underaged men, were involved in a sexual activity with the underaged man. If you want to go the route that the female needs to go to jail for sexual contact with an underaged male, you need to realize that 5 men also performed a sexual act with the under aged male.
 

skauma said:
^you were the one shopping for a charge. I was showing you how it was ambiguous....

i.e. The girl had sex with an underaged male, she needs to go to jail!!!

Sure, its true that an underaged male penetrated her, but its also true that 5 other, not underaged men, were involved in a sexual activity with the underaged man. If you want to go the route that the female needs to go to jail for sexual contact with an underaged male, you need to realize that 5 men also performed a sexual act with the under aged male.
Click to expand...

Actually, the recruit left the apartment (by all accounts) after the initial threesome.

Your reading comprehension is simply awful. Go away.
 




The male in question is a minor. However, the age of consent in MN is 16. It does not matter if there's an age difference of 4 plus years. In this state, a 16 year old can consent to have relations with a 40 year old and the law sees nothing wrong with that, as long as there's not someone in a position of authority like a cop or teacher involved. As messed up as that is, that's the law here.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom