STrib: Regent finalist Jim Carter accuses U of M leaders of smear campaign

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
61,815
Reaction score
17,774
Points
113
per STrib:

Jim Carter, a finalist for the University of Minnesota’s governing board, is accusing U leaders of trying to scuttle his candidacy after Twin Cities reporters received anonymous letters about a 1976 sexual harassment lawsuit against the former Green Bay Packer and his team.

Carter, one of three finalists for a vacancy in the Second Congressional District, said he has no evidence that University President Eric Kaler’s administration was involved in what he described as a smear campaign against him.

The letters included news clipping copies about an incident in which Carter exposed himself to a team receptionist and asked for oral sex. They promise to complicate Carter’s Board of Regents candidacy on the heels of the suspensions of Gophers football players involved in a sexual assault investigation and the firing of their coach — a highly publicized episode whose handling Carter has vocally criticized.

“I have no reason not to believe that President Kaler and his administration are not involved in this,” said Carter, a former Gopher.

“I think Kaler is afraid of what I know is happening at the university,” said Carter, a former Gopher. “He doesn’t want somebody like me asking questions on the board.”

http://www.startribune.com/regent-f...-of-minn-leaders-of-smear-campaign/410663305/

Go Gophers!!
 


Kalers enemies find him so much more effective than he can possibly be.
 


What Jim appears to be saying is the preponderance of evidence is that Kaler more likely than not did this.

See how easy that was? I like this standard of proof. Kaler can't prove he didn't do it, I presume.
 



What Jim appears to be saying is the preponderance of evidence is that Kaler more likely than not did this.

See how easy that was? I like this standard of proof. Kaler can't prove he didn't do it, I presume.

You can bury your head in the sand if you want, but the facts are there. Scarf man said Kaler did it. What more proof do you need. You are clearly pro-smearing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 





Kohler sure knows how to play dirty. We've seen enough of that.
 

Good. I am a SSP alumini. Jim Carter was a legend. He is now Al Sharpton. Nighty night.
 

per STrib:

Jim Carter, a finalist for the University of Minnesota’s governing board, is accusing U leaders of trying to scuttle his candidacy after Twin Cities reporters received anonymous letters about a 1976 sexual harassment lawsuit against the former Green Bay Packer and his team.

Carter, one of three finalists for a vacancy in the Second Congressional District, said he has no evidence that University President Eric Kaler’s administration was involved in what he described as a smear campaign against him.

The letters included news clipping copies about an incident in which Carter exposed himself to a team receptionist and asked for oral sex. They promise to complicate Carter’s Board of Regents candidacy on the heels of the suspensions of Gophers football players involved in a sexual assault investigation and the firing of their coach — a highly publicized episode whose handling Carter has vocally criticized.

“I have no reason not to believe that President Kaler and his administration are not involved in this,” said Carter, a former Gopher.

“I think Kaler is afraid of what I know is happening at the university,” said Carter, a former Gopher. “He doesn’t want somebody like me asking questions on the board.”

http://www.startribune.com/regent-f...-of-minn-leaders-of-smear-campaign/410663305/

Go Gophers!!
Very odd way to put it: "I have NO reason NOT to believe that President Kalor and his administration are NOT involved in this."
 

What Jim appears to be saying is the preponderance of evidence is that Kaler more likely than not did this.

See how easy that was? I like this standard of proof. Kaler can't prove he didn't do it, I presume.

If you read the entire post, Carter said, "...he has no evidence that University President Eric Kaler’s administration was involved in what he described as a smear campaign against him."

You can't make a preponderance of evidence claim without at least some evidence. What Carter actually claimed was a belief. But then, some people believe in Santa Clause.

Carter is burnt toast no matter how he tries to spin it.
 



If you read the entire post, Carter said, "...he has no evidence that University President Eric Kaler’s administration was involved in what he described as a smear campaign against him."

You can't make a preponderance of evidence claim without at least some evidence. What Carter actually claimed was a belief. But then, some people believe in Santa Clause.

Carter is burnt toast no matter how he tries to spin it.

I am being facetious in the the sense of what evidence exists that the 5 raped the girl? One person's opinion/belief is all that is necessary.
 

Can you imagine Carter on the BOR???? You want to talk about a sh^t show?!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

I don't see why people are getting upset. If you track the negatives he's clearly stating that Kaler is not involved.

“I have no reason not to believe (i.e. he believes) that President Kaler and his administration are not involved in this"

I'm more worried about his communication.
 

He should team up with Eric Escula , the other scarf guy and put together a reality show on the U.
 

He should team up with Eric Escula , the other scarf guy and put together a reality show on the U.

Wait, is that the second Almanac reference in this thread?

Wouldn't it be normal to do a background check on any potential BOR candidate? Not sure why Jim is surprised someone found that.
 


I don't see why people are getting upset. If you track the negatives he's clearly stating that Kaler is not involved.

“I have no reason not to believe (i.e. he believes) that President Kaler and his administration are not involved in this"

I'm more worried about his communication.

Carter is your typical doorknob 60's athlete. If he hadn't a rich dad, he'd be just retiring from his garbage truck driving job.
 

Carter is your typical doorknob 60's athlete. If he hadn't a rich dad, he'd be just retiring from his garbage truck driving job.

History tells us that wouldn't disqualify him from becoming a Regent..
 

I'm not fan of Kaler or the AD these days.... but Jim is also not helpful here, or really in the past...
 

I watched Anchorman. Jim's behaviour seems on par for the 1970s.
 

I'm not fan of Kaler or the AD these days.... but Jim is also not helpful here, or really in the past...

AMEN. Scarf dude was an unknown until Kill left and hasn't been helpful since then. Looney. Bird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Lol! This guy is a joke. Of course he's disqualified.

Sorry buddy, your actions have consequences, especially when you're an adult.
 








Top Bottom