Stephen Strasburg's Contract is Undoubtedly the Worst in Sports History (crazy when looking at the numbers)

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,810
Reaction score
16,258
Points
113
Per Ryan:

Stephen Strasburg retired this week, deciding to hang up his cleats after battling persistent injuries to his pitching arm since 2020. The former phenom and No. 1 pick is now 35 and ailing and has officially moved on from the mound. Unfortunately for the Washington Nationals, they're still on the hook for his entire contract. When you look at the details, it's undoubtedly the worst deal in the history of professional sports.

Strasburg led the Nationals to a World Series title in 2019, garnering series MVP honors in the process. In addition to that, he had also just enjoyed his best professional season. Despite battling injuries for the previous four seasons, Strasburg put it all together in 2019, as he went 18-6 with a 3.32 ERA, a 1.04 WHIP and 251 strikeouts against 56 walks in 209 innings. He eclipsed the 30-start mark for only the third time in his career, as he toed the slab 33 times. Like teammate Anthony Rendon, Strasburg put up those huge numbers just before hitting free agency. Washington had a decision to make.

The Nationals chose Strasburg and handed him an absolutely massive deal. The seven-year, $245 million pact raised eyebrows at the time since the Nats' ace was on the wrong side of 30 and had dealt with injuries for years. Giving him $35 million a year into his late-30s seemed like the height of stupidity. Still, Washington decided he was a franchise player worthy of a big contract. They have regretted the deal ever since.

In the four seasons since, Strasburg has made eight starts. You read that right, he's only been on the mound eight times. It has been horrible to watch it all unfold.

Strasburg began the 2020 COVID-shortened season on the injured list and didn't pitch until August 9. Five days later he left his second start after facing three batters. He sat out the rest of the season due to nerve issues in his pitching hand and finished the year 0-1 with a 10.80 ERA, a 1.80 WHIP and two strikeouts in five innings.

Unfortunately for the Nationals, they'll have to pay Strasburg's entire contract despite his retirement. He's owed $105 million over the next three years, but it gets even weirder. Strasburg's deal has deferred money. Of that $35 million a year over the next three years, about $11.4 million will be deferred each year (as had been the case in every of the deal). Then, in 2027, 2028 and 2029 he'll receive $26.6 million in deferred payments each year. So essentially, starting in 2027 he'll have a three-year, $80 million contract thanks to the interest on the deferrals. If that wasn't enough, the Nationals didn't insure the contract, so they'll be on the hook for all of it.


Win Twins!!
 


I’m assuming it is not normal to have to pay on the rest of a contract if the player decides to retire?

The Bobby Bonilla situation is pretty wild too. He still gets $1.2M a year until 2035.
 




Either his agent is one of the best negotiators in the world, the Nationals have quite possibly the stupidest front offices, or a combination of the two. How do you agree to terms on a deal that pay him after his retirement? What was his motivation (other than competitiveness and/or pride) to start even one game after signing his deal?

The fact that NFL contracts count against your cap if a player retires (even if you're not paying them money) is really dumb, IMO. But this is a whole 'nother level of stupid that a team agrees to pay a player their full contract even if they retire.

So his 8 starts work out to being paid over $30MM per start. And they weren't even good starts. Yikes.
 

Either his agent is one of the best negotiators in the world, the Nationals have quite possibly the stupidest front offices, or a combination of the two. How do you agree to terms on a deal that pay him after his retirement? What was his motivation (other than competitiveness and/or pride) to start even one game after signing his deal?

The fact that NFL contracts count against your cap if a player retires (even if you're not paying them money) is really dumb, IMO. But this is a whole 'nother level of stupid that a team agrees to pay a player their full contract even if they retire.

So his 8 starts work out to being paid over $30MM per start. And they weren't even good starts. Yikes.

That is true about the Nationals front office. The courts had already ruled against the owners for collusion so unlike the NBA or NFL you couldn't verify what a player was offered making it much easier for an agent to lie about those offers.Something Boras was famous for. As for the long payoff, therewas a time when MLB just thought the contracts would just keep getting bigger and the geniuses who ran the Nationals were convinced that they could make more money if they invested the amount they didn't give the player right away so they spread it out.
 

Either his agent is one of the best negotiators in the world, the Nationals have quite possibly the stupidest front offices, or a combination of the two. How do you agree to terms on a deal that pay him after his retirement? What was his motivation (other than competitiveness and/or pride) to start even one game after signing his deal?

The fact that NFL contracts count against your cap if a player retires (even if you're not paying them money) is really dumb, IMO. But this is a whole 'nother level of stupid that a team agrees to pay a player their full contract even if they retire.

So his 8 starts work out to being paid over $30MM per start. And they weren't even good starts. Yikes.
I will say though I’d rather have a dumb front office with a WS championship than a smart one without one.
 





And that tracker is just making it to the Championship Final/Round, not even winning it.
Shit! I forgot about that. Makes it even worse. Somebody high up would get Strasburg through 8 innings scoreless in game 7 against the yankees and bring in Duran or Pagan and blow it.
 

I don’t know, isn’t Bobby Bonilla still getting paid $1 million a year into the next decade from the Mets?
 

I don’t know, isn’t Bobby Bonilla still getting paid $1 million a year into the next decade from the Mets?
That's a little different, as Bobby opted to defer some of the payments on his contract, so technically the Mets are at least paying for his work he did as a player. In the case of Strasburg he is getting paid full salary to not play baseball. If you look every July 1st there are a lot of guys still getting paid who haven't played in a long time - Ken Griffey Jr. for example.

Problem is, as I understand the Mets took the cash they saved upfront on Bobby and invested a lot of it with Bernie Madoff.
 







Top Bottom