brucekaupa
**** Commander
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Messages
- 2,069
- Reaction score
- 29
- Points
- 48
Yep, you can see the head jerk from the contact.At :06 seconds in the video Leonard's arm goes into Hollins' face. You can't do that.
Yep, you can see the head jerk from the contact.
In frames 312 to 314 you can see Hollin's head clearly go back and to the left. This leads me to believe there was a second fouler on the grassy knoll.
Dang! Stole my post!
Might (probably) get ripped here but I don't see a foul there. We got some luck, which I'll take, but there wasn't a lot of contact. B1G refs are inconsistent across the board this year though, so I wouldn't expect much less.[/QUOTE
In fact, Leonard appears to be doing all he can to avoid the foul -- as you'd expect a player to do in that situation. His arms are straight up, he's backing up. But, I agree, this type of foul is nearly always called on the defense and was called on the Gophers a couple of times on Paul's drives. I find this interpretation of the rules by the refs to be detrimental to the game. I'd want to see the foul be called on the player who caused the collision and often that's the shooter.
In fact, Leonard appears to be doing all he can to avoid the foul -- as you'd expect a player to do in that situation. His arms are straight up, he's backing up.
Another angle showing the steps.
Seriously though, do you think Colton Iverson would have seen it as a foul? Because I guarantee that if it had been him in the lane, he would have been called for the foul.
Colt would have been called for a flagrant foul.