I don't know if anybody saw the USA Today webpage article/chart regarding coaches salaries across 1-A football and assistant coaches ranges, but Brewster is one of the lowest paid coaches in the Big Ten. And the assistant coaches range, while it has improved since Mason, is still well below the market rate. Guys like Ted Roof don't leave because of schsims with Tim Brewster, they leave because they get paid a lot more for the same position at a different school.
There were a lot of things I saw today that I didn't like, but we're getting exactly what we're paying for with Tim Brewster (I'd actually argue that he's overdelivering, if you look at other programs across the country).
Until this university steps up their committment to the football program (TCF Bank is a great first step, but now money into the program is the next step), a coach with a resume like Tim Brewster is what we're going to get. And any coach that we go after is going to be similar until the U steps it up. The U stepped it up with Tubby (people can argue whether he fell into us or we got him, but the U is willing to step it up in terms of salary). It's time to do it for the football program. If not, who would come here?
The committment level isn't just financial either. What coach in their right mind would come here if a coach is dismissed within 3 seasons? The question to me is this: Is it Maturi who's being a bean counter and only trying to find a coach who's on the cheap? Or is he being told to find a coach on the cheap by the people above him?
With our current committment level, I assure you that Tony Dungy is NOT coming. Phil Fulmer is NOT coming. Patterson & Petersen are NOT coming.