Really? Come on...you think it would have been a much better situation had they broken the story a week earlier, or a week later? It was true...and as soon as a paper like the Pioneer Press broke the story, everyone should have known it was true. This wasn't a story about a coach getting fired, this was a story about one of the biggest academic scandals in the history of the NCAA. Where there's smoke, there is fire. And for the record, only one Stanford had to sit out that day.
It's a journalist's job to report. It's not their job to make sure it happens when it's convenient for everyone. You may not like that, and you may not agree with that, but it's how it works. Further, a newspaper's job is to sell newspapers. Again, you may not like that, but it's true. Put the two together, and they broke a huge story when they knew it would make national riptides. And it did.
In the end, everyone better remember that the academic scandal was created by the Gopher basketball team, their coach, and their staff, period. Continuing to kill the messenger is flat out ludicrous. The Pioneer Press didn't create the scandal; they just reported it.