Go Gophers Rah
Section 238 Row 21
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,374
- Reaction score
- 195
- Points
- 63
I know that it is 6 months until our 1st Kickoff in Murfreesboro, Tenn.
At this point in time, here is how I would rank our schedule (easiest to hardest) - with each team's 2009 record in paranthesees:
12. South Dakota (5-5 FCS) (the easiest opponent in Brewster's tenure)
11. at Illinois (3-9) (they lost several key players)
10. Northern Illinois (7-6) (above avg MAC team... that says it all)
9. at Middle Tennessee State (10-3) (I think they're good, but early in the season favors us)
8. at Purdue (5-7) (could be vastly improved, but I think not yet)
7. Northwestern (8-5) (they lost a lot of players and we ALWAYS play them tough)
6. at Michigan State (6-7) (Personally, I think they're a program in decline)
5. at Wisconsin (10-3) (could be better than this, but we've played tham close recently)
4. Penn State (11-2) (lose some key players, but they're awefully deep and talented)
3. USC (9-4) (players skill/athleticism is awesome, but will they still be figuring themselves out?)
2. Iowa (11-2) (could be worse than this, but we could be in a late season swoon)
1. Ohio State (11-2)
We'll need some road wins and/or a big upset (something we haven't done since 2005) just to get to a bowl game again. If we lose to MTSU in the 1st game of the season, it might be awfully hard to claw our way back into the bowl picture. I know everyone thought 2009 was a killer schedule, but I had always thought that the 2009 schedule looked easier than 2010.
At this point in time, here is how I would rank our schedule (easiest to hardest) - with each team's 2009 record in paranthesees:
12. South Dakota (5-5 FCS) (the easiest opponent in Brewster's tenure)
11. at Illinois (3-9) (they lost several key players)
10. Northern Illinois (7-6) (above avg MAC team... that says it all)
9. at Middle Tennessee State (10-3) (I think they're good, but early in the season favors us)
8. at Purdue (5-7) (could be vastly improved, but I think not yet)
7. Northwestern (8-5) (they lost a lot of players and we ALWAYS play them tough)
6. at Michigan State (6-7) (Personally, I think they're a program in decline)
5. at Wisconsin (10-3) (could be better than this, but we've played tham close recently)
4. Penn State (11-2) (lose some key players, but they're awefully deep and talented)
3. USC (9-4) (players skill/athleticism is awesome, but will they still be figuring themselves out?)
2. Iowa (11-2) (could be worse than this, but we could be in a late season swoon)
1. Ohio State (11-2)
We'll need some road wins and/or a big upset (something we haven't done since 2005) just to get to a bowl game again. If we lose to MTSU in the 1st game of the season, it might be awfully hard to claw our way back into the bowl picture. I know everyone thought 2009 was a killer schedule, but I had always thought that the 2009 schedule looked easier than 2010.