Purdue's appeal to allow coach Jeff Brohm to communicate remotely has been denied.

A_Slab_of_Bacon

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2015
Messages
23,604
Reaction score
13,471
Points
113


Not a huge surprise here. Coming up with some new parameters / rules for coaches to operate in ... the week of the game makes no sense.

I think FSU already asked for a similar thing and was denied already.
 
Last edited:

This combined with the Rondale Moore news makes Iowa -3 very appealing.
 

Maybe he should circle the stadium in his old honda accord and bark out orders.
 


As I previously said. I'm not sure why there's a problem with him communicating remotely.
I agree. However once they turned down others, they had no choice in doing it for everyone. I'm sure it will be discussed in the off season.
 



“Rule 1-4-11-b is very specific and allows only voice communications between the press box and the team area, therefore in (a) the coach could not call into the press box or the sideline for anything related to coaching purposes.”

"Prohibited Field Equipment – Rule 1-4-11

Play #1: The Head Coach of the home team is in quarantine, and wants to monitor the
TV broadcast and (a) call in plays via cell phone to the offensive coordinator (b) use a
virtual application (Zoom, Microsoft Teams, etc.) to communicate with the team in the
locker room.

RULING: Rule 1-4-11-b is very specific and allows only voice communications between
the press box and the team area, therefore in (a) the coach could not call into the press
box or the sideline for anything related to coaching purposes.

Rule 1-4-11-a prohibits the use of technology including computers to be used for
coaching purposes
and this would include all virtual types of communication back to a
team during the game, consequently in (b) any virtual session with the team would not
be allowed. This prohibition would begin at 90 minutes before the scheduled kickoff
when the officiating crew assumes jurisdiction of the game and would include the time
between periods until the end of the game when the Referee declares the score final."

This is why. It's a good rule. Brohm would have a huge advantage.
 

“Rule 1-4-11-b is very specific and allows only voice communications between the press box and the team area, therefore in (a) the coach could not call into the press box or the sideline for anything related to coaching purposes.”

"Prohibited Field Equipment – Rule 1-4-11

Play #1: The Head Coach of the home team is in quarantine, and wants to monitor the
TV broadcast and (a) call in plays via cell phone to the offensive coordinator (b) use a
virtual application (Zoom, Microsoft Teams, etc.) to communicate with the team in the
locker room.

RULING: Rule 1-4-11-b is very specific and allows only voice communications between
the press box and the team area, therefore in (a) the coach could not call into the press
box or the sideline for anything related to coaching purposes.

Rule 1-4-11-a prohibits the use of technology including computers to be used for
coaching purposes
and this would include all virtual types of communication back to a
team during the game, consequently in (b) any virtual session with the team would not
be allowed. This prohibition would begin at 90 minutes before the scheduled kickoff
when the officiating crew assumes jurisdiction of the game and would include the time
between periods until the end of the game when the Referee declares the score final."

This is why. It's a good rule. Brohm would have a huge advantage.
Agreed. Teams would find a way to cheat with it.
 

All those astronauts and we can’t get a secret Zoom going to the HC’s sofa, eh Purdue?
 





Rules...Smoles. It’s a different reality with Covid.
It is. But it's not like they'd allow a team to use an ineligible player as a "stand in" for one game, because an eligible player has to sit-out with a covid infection.

Not the same thing, of course. But the point is that, every team will have to deal with it the same way.
 








Top Bottom