Proposed Rule Changes for 2012

MaxyJR1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
11,862
Reaction score
6,104
Points
113
Committee recommends several football rules proposals to enhance safety
By Ty Halpin
NCAA.org

The NCAA Football Rules Committee, which met Tuesday-Thursday in Charlotte, N.C., has recommended several rules proposals intended to enhance student-athlete safety for the 2012 season. Even though it is a non-rules change year as part of the two-year cycle process, these rule changes can be proposed for immediate implementation because they directly impact student-athlete safety.

“In all of our proposals, we are continuing the annual effort to find ways to make our game safer where we can,” said Scot Dapp, chair of the committee and athletics director at Moravian College. “Without question, these changes will enhance student-athlete safety and we feel very comfortable based on the data we collected that the impact will be significant.”

The proposed changes include:

•Kickoff and Touchback Starting Lines Moved. The committee voted to move the kickoff to the 35-yard line (currently set at the 30-yard line), and to require that kicking team players must be no further than five yards from the 35 at the kick, which is intended to limit the running start kicking teams have during the play. The committee also voted to move the touchback distance on free kicks to the 25-yard line instead of the 20-yard line to encourage more touchbacks. NCAA data indicates injuries during kickoffs occur more often than in other phases of the game.
•Loss of Helmet During Play. If a player loses his helmet (other than as the result of a foul by the opponent, like a facemask), it will be treated like an injury. The player must leave the game and is not allowed to participate for the next play. Current injury timeout rules guard against using this rule to gain an advantage from stopping the clock. Additionally, if a player loses his helmet, he must not continue to participate in play to protect him from injury. Data collected during the 2011 season indicated that helmets came off of players more than two times per game.
•Blocking Below the Waist. The intent of the changes made last season were to only allow blocking below the waist when the opposing player is likely to be prepared for this contact, but the opposite impact was discovered in some cases. To clarify the intent, the committee approved wording that essentially allows offensive players in the tackle box at the snap that are not in motion to block below the waist legally without restriction. All other players are restricted from blocking below the waist with a few exceptions (e.g. straight ahead blocks).
•Shield Blocking Scheme on Punting Plays. The committee reviewed several examples of shield blocking, which has become a popular blocking scheme for punting teams. In several cases, a receiving team player attempts to jump over this type of scheme in the backfield to block a punt. In some cases, these players are contacted and end up flipping in the air and landing on their head or shoulders. The committee is extremely concerned about this type of action and proposed a rule similar to the leaping rule on place kicks that does not allow the receiving team to jump over blockers, unless the player jumps straight up or between two players.
•Additional Protection to Kick Returner. Through officiating interpretation, the committee approved a recommendation to provide a kick returner additional protection to complete a catch before allowing contact by the kicking team.

All rules change recommendations must be approved by the Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which meets via conference call Feb. 21. The proposals will first be sent to the NCAA membership for comment.
 

Weak rule changes, IMO.
 

I think moving the kickoffs up could be a real positive for the gophs. We have suffered for a while not having a kicker who can reach the endzone.
 

I thought the lateral back-but-muff-forward-for-first-down rule that happened against Neb was supposed to be changed.
 

I think moving the kickoffs up could be a real positive for the gophs. We have suffered for a while not having a kicker who can reach the endzone.

This would end up hurting the Gophers on returns though as it takes away weapons like Troy and Jones.
 


If they kicking team can't get as big a running start, would that lead to longer kick returns?
 


I thought the lateral back-but-muff-forward-for-first-down rule that happened against Neb was supposed to be changed.

Per the article, only player safety rule changes are eligible this year. That rule change could be addressed next year.
 

SMU GOPHS FAN said:
This would end up hurting the Gophers on returns though as it takes away weapons like Troy and Jones.
More so Troy who will be trying to break the NCAA K/O return record this year.
 



More so Troy who will be trying to break the NCAA K/O return record this year.

THe good news maybe is that if he does, it might be harder for others to break his record.
 




Top Bottom