'Overwhelming Circumstantial Evidence' points to Wuhan Lab as Covid Origin





Spoofin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
21,790
Reaction score
5,826
Points
113
Let’s not forget how the left and the MSM treated this theory not long ago…..
“debunked”, “conspiracy theory”, “racist”

now WaPo (which I am told is a very good and balanced outlet) is changing headlines on 2020 stories. Gotta get in front of it now, I guess 🤷‍♂️

 


Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
10,147
Reaction score
4,494
Points
113
Let’s not forget how the left and the MSM treated this theory not long ago…..
“debunked”, “conspiracy theory”, “racist”

now WaPo (which I am told is a very good and balanced outlet) is changing headlines on 2020 stories. Gotta get in front of it now, I guess 🤷‍♂️

At least they acknowledge when things change.

The right wing media still says Dump won the election....
🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

MplsGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2017
Messages
27,193
Reaction score
6,657
Points
113
Of all the circumstantial evidence, this is the most troublesome piece:

There are several curious features about this insert but the oddest is that of the two side-by-side CGG codons. Only 5% of SARS2’s arginine codons are CGG, and the double codon CGG-CGG has not been found in any other beta-coronavirus. So how did SARS2 acquire a pair of arginine codons that are favored by human cells but not by coronaviruses?

There's unfortunately never going to be a more "satisfying" answer to this than:

“Yes, but your wording makes this sound unlikely — viruses are specialists at unusual events,” is the riposte of David L. Robertson, a virologist at the University of Glasgow who regards lab escape as a conspiracy theory. “Recombination is naturally very, very frequent in these viruses, there are recombination breakpoints in the spike protein and these codons appear unusual exactly because we’ve not sampled enough.”


If indeed natural emergence is the truth, it's going to take work and sampling effort to (attempt to) prove it.

If the fact of the matter is that this double-codon was inserted by man, inside the WIV as part of non-nefarious scientific research, I doubt the Chinese are ever going to allow that to come to light. Unless they receive public assurance from the US (and probably other power countries) that there will be no financial liability seeking against them.
 





bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,359
Reaction score
5,437
Points
113
Yet another reason why China would have pumped money into deposing Trump- by helping rig the election.

"We have a really good idea what happened here," Pompeo said. "There is an enormous amount of evidence that there was a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. There is a pile of evidence a hundred feet high, I have high confidence that that’s the case. We pressed the Chinese Communist Party really hard – not just the State Department, but our CDC and others too."

Pompeo went on to say that the administration was "serious in this endeavor" and that it "made clear that there would be real cost" to the Chinese government.

An advisory board member to the World Health Organization told Fox News last week that China's "massive cover-up" on COVID-19 is still happening today as the Wuhan lab-leak origin theory gains momentum.
 

Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
10,147
Reaction score
4,494
Points
113
Yet another reason why China would have pumped money into deposing Trump- by helping rig the election.

"We have a really good idea what happened here," Pompeo said. "There is an enormous amount of evidence that there was a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. There is a pile of evidence a hundred feet high, I have high confidence that that’s the case. We pressed the Chinese Communist Party really hard – not just the State Department, but our CDC and others too."

Pompeo went on to say that the administration was "serious in this endeavor" and that it "made clear that there would be real cost" to the Chinese government.

An advisory board member to the World Health Organization told Fox News last week that China's "massive cover-up" on COVID-19 is still happening today as the Wuhan lab-leak origin theory gains momentum.
Should we go to war with China?

I nominate you for a kamakazi mission.
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,359
Reaction score
5,437
Points
113
Last year when an article was released revealing the possibility that the Covid virus was engineered- as we now know it was, Dr. Fauci's first move was to call a teleconference. The first guy he wanted to include in the 3 person phone conference was British pharmaceutical billionaire Jeremy Farrar. Hmmm. What was the reason for going off line (not via email) with Farrar? What would he have to do with the situation?
 

bga1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
44,359
Reaction score
5,437
Points
113
Fauci caught in another lie. Asked if he knew if Farrar got in touch with Tedros at WHO after their phone call - Fauci claims to not know. The email chain says otherwise. Farrar was directing the WHO how to react after the story got out that the virus was engineered. The WHO complied and asked Farrar and accordingly Fauci to supply names of the people that would craft the "official" story that the virus origins were natural. All other opinion had to be snuffed.

 



howeda7

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
57,145
Reaction score
13,129
Points
113
Have we considered the possibility that Fauci himself developed and leaked Covid to take down Trump and then brilliantly blamed it on China?
 


Wally

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
10,147
Reaction score
4,494
Points
113
Last year when an article was released revealing the possibility that the Covid virus was engineered- as we now know it was, Dr. Fauci's first move was to call a teleconference. The first guy he wanted to include in the 3 person phone conference was British pharmaceutical billionaire Jeremy Farrar. Hmmm. What was the reason for going off line (not via email) with Farrar? What would he have to do with the situation?

Your point is?
 




Top Bottom