New position for Maturi




Inmate? This is probably a good position for Joel. I don't think we had any scandals or major infractions under his watch.

I would call giving Pam Borton a two-year extension as he was going out the door a major infraction.
 



I would call giving Pam Borton a two-year extension as he was going out the door a major infraction.

I don't want to make this an OT discussion, but how is it an NCAA infraction? Also, is it his decision solely? Doesn't Kaler have to sign off as well? Serious questions

I'm not saying he was a good AD. He did some good things and did some very poor things. I will say he ran a clean, but under producing, department.
 


I don't want to make this an OT discussion, but how is it an NCAA infraction? Also, is it his decision solely? Doesn't Kaler have to sign off as well? Serious questions

I'm not saying he was a good AD. He did some good things and did some very poor things. I will say he ran a clean, but under producing, department.

Sarcasm meter - never said it was an NCAA infraction,just a major infraction in judgement.
 




Sarcasm meter - never said it was an NCAA infraction,just a major infraction in judgement.

And that's being kind.

This Borton extension and the way it was handled was wrong in so many ways.
 



It's a real issue

Without commenting on Mr. Maturi's record as AD, his leaving brings up a real and pressing issue; that is the monstrous administrative bloat at the U of M under President Kaler's stewardship.

Bluntly, it is inexcusable. As we speak, it is sucking the lifeblood (money) from other pressing and important initiatives at the U. Hopefully, President Kaler will not fill Mr. Maturi's position whatever it was when he leaves, as I'm sure that all-in it was probably a half a million dollar per year chair. Not filling Mr. Maturi's chair should be just the beginning of a material and immediate series of steps to regain control of the University of Minnesota from the bureaucratriat.

There have been several "big journalism" looks at the problems at the U - notably, the WSJ and the Washington Post. The Post notes:

"In the past decade, Minnesota’s administrative payroll has gone up three times as fast as the teaching payroll, and twice as fast as student enrollment. Oh, and tuition more than doubled in that same period, to more than $13,000 per year.

Strangely the Strib, the PP, MPR, 'CCO and others who should be very curious have so far been unexcitable.

This waste is beyond the ordinary fluff. It is reckless and it is coming from the top. It should be a concern of every fan, every student and every alumnus. Imagine money for more research scientists, scholarships, international partnerships or practice facilities. It exists. It's just being wasted by a completely dysfunctional and undisciplined President's office as well as I presume Board of Regents

I don't know Mr. Kaler. I haven't followed his time as president that closely. I know that he does many things well. It's not personal or ad hominem. I wish him the best. However, he has completely let this thing get out of control.

Remember, it's for the children. (snarky comment, I know - but I've kinda been waiting to use it)
 



Oh, and when I signed on here today I originally wanted to just find a place to post how much fun I had as a Gopher alumnus this week. Thanks Station 19 for diverting me to my high horse. I'll get down now.
 

I can almost guarantee you that he will find a way to put Minnesota on probation in some sport given his pro-Wisconsin leanings!!
 

Without commenting on Mr. Maturi's record as AD, his leaving brings up a real and pressing issue; that is the monstrous administrative bloat at the U of M under President Kaler's stewardship.

Bluntly, it is inexcusable. As we speak, it is sucking the lifeblood (money) from other pressing and important initiatives at the U. Hopefully, President Kaler will not fill Mr. Maturi's position whatever it was when he leaves, as I'm sure that all-in it was probably a half a million dollar per year chair. Not filling Mr. Maturi's chair should be just the beginning of a material and immediate series of steps to regain control of the University of Minnesota from the bureaucratriat.

There have been several "big journalism" looks at the problems at the U - notably, the WSJ and the Washington Post. The Post notes:

"In the past decade, Minnesota’s administrative payroll has gone up three times as fast as the teaching payroll, and twice as fast as student enrollment. Oh, and tuition more than doubled in that same period, to more than $13,000 per year.

Strangely the Strib, the PP, MPR, 'CCO and others who should be very curious have so far been unexcitable.

This waste is beyond the ordinary fluff. It is reckless and it is coming from the top. It should be a concern of every fan, every student and every alumnus. Imagine money for more research scientists, scholarships, international partnerships or practice facilities. It exists. It's just being wasted by a completely dysfunctional and undisciplined President's office as well as I presume Board of Regents

I don't know Mr. Kaler. I haven't followed his time as president that closely. I know that he does many things well. It's not personal or ad hominem. I wish him the best. However, he has completely let this thing get out of control.

Remember, it's for the children. (snarky comment, I know - but I've kinda been waiting to use it)

Whoa, hold on there on the blaming Kaler thing. Kaler has cut administrative positions considerably since taking office. I won't argue that there wasn't some bloat (which came about under Bruinincks), but the U is heading back in the right direction since Kaler has taken over. He is cutting redundant positions and demanding greater accountability from administrators.
 

Whoa, hold on there on the blaming Kaler thing. Kaler has cut administrative positions considerably since taking office. I won't argue that there wasn't some bloat (which came about under Bruinincks), but the U is heading back in the right direction since Kaler has taken over. He is cutting redundant positions and demanding greater accountability from administrators.

Although I'll pick at it a little, I think this response is reasonably correct. Kaler's only held the position for 1.5 years. The U is undoubtedly a bloated mess - more than just "some bloat" - but the spending boom and attendant bloat referred to by the Wall Street Journal and other publications was all Bruininks. He inflicted a lot of damage on the U, both institutionally and in its esteem among the legislature, taxpayers and even large swaths of the alumni.

Kaler hasn't made significant adjustments thus far. He's mostly just cut around the edges, but he is making genuine efforts to better track spending and needs to be given a fair chance. Whether he ends up making only minor adjustments or emerges a real reformer however, it's entirely inaccurate to pin the pre-existing bloat on him.
 

Meting out swift, decisive justice. Sounds like Joel! Great hire, NCAA. You're a first-class organization these days.
 

I am aghast at the thought that this man will yet be in position to hold power and authority to continue to cripple Gopher Athletics. Absolutely terrifying.
 

Whoa, hold on there on the blaming Kaler thing. Kaler has cut administrative positions considerably since taking office. I won't argue that there wasn't some bloat (which came about under Bruinincks), but the U is heading back in the right direction since Kaler has taken over. He is cutting redundant positions and demanding greater accountability from administrators.

Sigh. . . Why is it that everyone wants to go to the blame phase first? Who gives a rip whose fault it is? If I'd thought anyone should be interested in whose fault it was, I would have brought up Bruinincks. That's the past man.

I'm concerned about the future. I'd like the U to be, and be seen as, the world class institution that it should be. That should be (and I'm sure is) his immutable goal.

President Kaler is the leader now. And a grotesque misallocation of scarce resources continues right now. It's a big obstacle to that goal now.

Frankly, as a leader he owes his constituents a clearer articulation of his intentions and his demonstrable steps to achieve it. I hope he's got one. As I said, " I wish him well". But we haven't seen it. And, working on the margins is not a good sign.

Saying it was someone else's fault is not leadership.
 

Oh, and when I signed on here today I originally wanted to just find a place to post how much fun I had as a Gopher alumnus this week. Thanks Station 19 for diverting me to my high horse. I'll get down now.

Ah, you're welcome. I've enjoyed reading your posts.
 




Top Bottom