BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,971
- Reaction score
- 18,160
- Points
- 113
It's a valid point by bracketologists, but if the Gophers win 3 of these final 4 (far from a given, but doable) they will have answered that question more than adequately.
By my way of thinking, winning 3 of 4 would mean the Gophers had a record of "5.5" wins and 6 losses without Al, with potentially 2+ road wins (also Iowa & perhaps Northwestern) and between 2.5-3.5 quality wins (vs. teams legitimately competing for a NCAA bid). ... Michigan (perhaps totaling 1.5, that's when Al got hurt), Michigan State and Penn State.
5-6 (or 5.5 and 6 if you'll go with me on the half without Al theory) all things considered would prove that the Gophers were capable without Al. It certainly wouldn't be enough to leave them out of the tournament simply because Al wasn't available. Those wins vs. North Carolina and West Virginia still happened.
Now if we only win 2 of these final 4, then I think it's a legitimate issue and the Gophers would have to do significant damage (2 wins) in Indy just to get a sniff.
If the Gopher basketball program/U Media Relations has any brains whatsoever, they should be getting the word out that they expect Al back for the Big Ten tourney, even if they know darn well he's not going to return. Plant that seed in the Selection Committee's mind that he'll be back. It's called playing the game.
As a friend of mine (Ope3) pointed out to me, think Iowa and Luke Recker 10 years ago. Iowa was a bubble team and knew darn well the injured Recker wasn't going to be back, but they publicly stated he would be ready for the NCAA Tournament. It ended up being a moot point. ... the Hawkeyes won the Big Ten tourney without him.
Option A - 22 W on March 13th = in. 21 W = maybe. 20 W = doubtful. And < 20 W = nope.
Option B - W a game on March 13th = in. (That would mean Gophers W B10T automatic bid)
Work to do.
Obviously no one knows until Selection Sunday, but I think 9-9 in the conference and one Big Ten Tourney win would be good enough.
You keep saying this, and I have no idea why. 20 wins = in. 21 wins = dead certain mortal lock, there's no possible way we'd be out. How is this a maybe? 19 wins = probably out.
Path to 21 W = W over Penn St, Mich, NWU but L to Mich St. That's 20 W going into B10 T. Thursday W (probably) over one of the bottom 4 teams in B10T = 21 W.
Possible but I don't see that as a lock.
If we finish 3-1, and even lose the first game in the B10 tourney, I still think we're in. The bubble is just terrible this year.
Let me put it this way FOT, if we get to 21 wins and don't make it in, I will be upset with the selection committee more than the gopher squad.
Let's just look at this: Do the Gophers pass the 'eye test?" Right now...no. Any half educated basketball mind can see that Minnesota just isn't a good team without Nolen. Not even a decent team really. They are just flat out bad. HOWEVER. There is ample opportunity to change this in the final four games. Beating fellow bubble teams in Michigan would be huge.
Probably. But our most likely seed at 9-9 is #6 I'd say. And a loss to Iowa isn't good for anyone. There's a decent chance we could get the #5 seed at 9-9 though I don't think the tie-breakers with Ill or MSU will favor us.
I doubt 9-9 gets us a 6 seed, let alone a 5, but hey, I would love to be wrong.
Probably. But our most likely seed at 9-9 is #6 I'd say. And a loss to Iowa isn't good for anyone. There's a decent chance we could get the #5 seed at 9-9 though I don't think the tie-breakers with Ill or MSU will favor us.
I think if we beat MSU tonight the tiebreaker with them would favor us since we split with them and beat a better team (Purdue). Please correct me if I am wrong though.
fryguy,
It would be the case if Purdue and OSU tie. Or if Purdue finishes second alone.
If Wisconsin and Purdue are tied, however, then the tiebreaker would move further along as the Spartans beat Wisconsin.