Mike Lindell Loses It On CNN Reporter As His Cyber Symposium Disintegrates

Gopher_In_NYC

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
6,058
Reaction score
3,750
Points
113
"There's no pile or evidence then? Not even a pile of Bull Shite." MPG for Gov!!!

Our own beloved CRG shows up at 2:25 in the clip with the most eloquent take on it yet - not to be missed!!

Clip =


Article =



MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s disastrous “Cyber Symposium” concluded on Thursday without offering any of his promised evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

But when confronted by a CNN reporter, Lindell claimed he couldn’t show the evidence, as he’d promised, because of something-something, the media.

“I have that proof with my people that we’re bringing to the Supreme Court,” Lindell told CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan. “I don’t need the media driving the narrative before my case to the Supreme Court.”

That excuse was in sharp contrast to his claims leading up to the event, in which he promised to deliver “100%, non-subjective evidence” that Donald Trump won the election. (He didn’t.)

Lindell swore his evidence would be so strong that the Supreme Court would unanimously rule in his favor, that President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris would resign and that Trump would be reinstated on Aug. 13.

Instead, the supposed evidence was described by one of Lindell’s own experts as a “turd.”

O’Sullivan brought election security expert Harri Hursti to Lindell’s event to analyze anything he produced.

“We expected a huge pile of data which we wouldn’t be able to understand and how it can be evidence,” Hursti said. “We didn’t expect there’s no pile of anything.”
 


STPGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
6,688
Reaction score
960
Points
113
"There's no pile or evidence then? Not even a pile of Bull Shite." MPG for Gov!!!

Our own beloved CRG shows up at 2:25 in the clip with the most eloquent take on it yet - not to be missed!!

Clip =


Article =



MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s disastrous “Cyber Symposium” concluded on Thursday without offering any of his promised evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

But when confronted by a CNN reporter, Lindell claimed he couldn’t show the evidence, as he’d promised, because of something-something, the media.

“I have that proof with my people that we’re bringing to the Supreme Court,” Lindell told CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan. “I don’t need the media driving the narrative before my case to the Supreme Court.”

That excuse was in sharp contrast to his claims leading up to the event, in which he promised to deliver “100%, non-subjective evidence” that Donald Trump won the election. (He didn’t.)

Lindell swore his evidence would be so strong that the Supreme Court would unanimously rule in his favor, that President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris would resign and that Trump would be reinstated on Aug. 13.

Instead, the supposed evidence was described by one of Lindell’s own experts as a “turd.”

O’Sullivan brought election security expert Harri Hursti to Lindell’s event to analyze anything he produced.

“We expected a huge pile of data which we wouldn’t be able to understand and how it can be evidence,” Hursti said. “We didn’t expect there’s no pile of anything.”
T-Shirt material.
 




Top Bottom