Mark Coyle , like so many of his peers, reaps rewards of athletes' labors

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
62,397
Reaction score
19,238
Points
113
per Syracuse.com:

There's no putting the toothpaste back in the tube. The idea of college sports being an extracurricular activity wherein the fellas can blow off some steam in the gym or on a back field before returning, invigorated, to the classroom rests with spats.

Nevertheless, what we witnessed on Wednesday, another example of evolution gone bad, was little more than an indictment.

That Mark Coyle will be paid roughly a million dollars a year in salary, incentives, goods and services to oversee the sandbox that is the University of Minnesota's athletic department isn't the issue, really. He is, after all, a good capitalist with a nose made to sniff out profit.

And, oh, by abandoning Syracuse University and beating that path to those Golden Gophers, Coyle went from wealthy to wealthier with the stroke of a pen. We've fought wars to ensure the kind of day the Orange's drive-by athletic director enjoyed out there in Minneapolis, so bully for him and for his family that has been secured for generations.

http://www.syracuse.com/poliquin/in...reaps_the_rewards_of_the_athletes_labors.html

Go Gophers!!
 

And,

Mark pretty much admitted to having begun his romancing of the Gophers within weeks of arriving in Syracuse from Boise State. After landing among us and boasting of his transparency and his insistence to "live in truth," he engaged for months in a secretive mating dance with his Minnesota suitors. Upon accepting a third job in a third time zone in a span of 300ish days, he promised to bring stability and accountability and consistency to his newest employer.
 

So does this mean Syracuse will not pay their next guy anything? or pay the athletes?

It's an issue, but it seems like an odd point to make considering Syracuse doesn't seem to be happy to participate in the system.
 

We felt the same way when Holtz left, so I guess I can't blame the sour grapes.
 

Well, at least they aren't happy to see him go. So I guess they thought he was doing a good job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Well, at least they aren't happy to see him go. So I guess they thought he was doing a good job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think it was more that he showed up and left in a few months. Can't blame them for that.
 

The fact that they are upset he left doesn't support the theory that ADs are overpaid.
 

We felt the same way when Holtz left, so I guess I can't blame the sour grapes.

Very/kind of true. Coyle at Syracuse,did say many of the same things Lying Lou said here. The difference being that it's pretty doubtful that any advertisers, Season Ticket holders or athletes made their decisions based on Coyle being the A.D.
 






No. That is a lie started by Sid and people believe it to this day.

Very true. Even at the time Paul Giel and the President of the U said there was no contract clause, but there was no reason to try and keep Holtz here if he wanted to go.
 

I'm surprised - sour grapes usually don't make this potent of whine.
 



WOW...

"Hi, i'm Syracuse...i'll take a large popcorn, extra SALT"
 

Wow, jilted lover love letter from Syracuse. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 

The funny thing is, we would've felt the same way if Norwood Teague had been lured away by, say, UVA after 10 months on the job here.

Lol. You just never know how things are going to turn out.
 

The funny thing is, we would've felt the same way if Norwood Teague had been lured away by, say, UVA after 10 months on the job here.

Lol. You just never know how things are going to turn out.

No doubt.

Other than coaching hires it's pretty hard to evaluate most ADs outside the program anyway.
 




Top Bottom