Marcus Fuller: Year 4: Is Tim Brewster the right guy to lead the Gophers?

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
62,261
Reaction score
18,938
Points
113
A long article from Marcus:

http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_15926571?nclick_check=1

Entering Tim Brewster's fourth season, Gophers athletics director Joel Maturi still won't judge his football coach on wins and losses.

"I've never seen anyone have us higher than 10th in the conference, and most thought of us as 11th," Maturi said. "Who knows what that will mean in wins and losses in the end? I think we're poised to surprise some people. Obviously, that's our goal. But it's in the eyes of the beholder. It's how you win and how you lose. The competitiveness of the wins and the losses all determine what's impressive and what's not."

# Entering Year 1, it was about Brewster recruiting more talent, attracting more fans and generating more support for a new campus stadium.

# Entering Year 2, it was about Brewster's players believing they could win coming off a program-worst 1-11 season.

# Entering Year 3, it was about Brewster's team facing adversity better after five straight losses ruined a 7-1 start in 2008.

Now, Brewster is at a crossroads as his team prepares for Thursday night's season opener at Middle Tennessee State. After finishing 6-7 with a second straight midlevel bowl game loss last season, the Gophers put him in a higher risk-reward situation.

They gave him a contract extension, adding two years and incentives to Brewster's original five-year deal, to extend him to 2013 and make recruits more comfortable about his future. But, Maturi said, "obviously we protected ourselves" by rewriting the buyout.

Instead of having to pay Brewster the entire remaining base salary on his contract if he is fired, the university will have to pay only $200,000 per remaining year, half his base.

"It gives you some wiggle room to make a decision on a guy," Big Ten Network analyst and former Northwestern player Chris Martin said. "I think it does speak to the fact, let's be obvious, that they've got their eye on him. He's got to step up to the plate. The reason they did that is to say we're not happy with just getting to a bowl. We want to get this thing to the next level. They don't just want a .350 hitter at the plate. They want a guy who is going to knock the ball out of the park."

Sure, Brewster could give himself instant credibility with a home run win this season over Southern Cal or Ohio State in Minnesota's second year at TCF Bank Stadium. Winning a trophy game against Wisconsin, Iowa or Penn State also would help his cause. Brewster, who in three years has a 14-24 record, 6-18 in the Big Ten, has never beaten a rival (0-9) or a ranked opponent (0-8).

"Obviously, when you beat an elite team, it's an indication that your program is competitive, that your program has the ability to compete at the highest level," Maturi said.

Maturi said, as always, he'll evaluate his head coach this year on how his players respond to him on and off the field (especially after a slew of legal incidents last season) and how his staff responds to him (especially after so much turnover). And, most important, for the second straight year, how his team handles adversity.

Maturi was as disappointed as anyone when he walked into the locker room after Minnesota's 14-13 Insight Bowl loss to Iowa State last year. Three years earlier, he decided to fire Glen Mason after a 44-41 overtime loss to Texas Tech. But he had a different feeling about Brewster's team.

"It was a good feeling for the AD to be in the locker room and know how much the kids cared," Maturi said. "If they didn't care, that would have been a concerning sign for me. It's a sign that they bought in. It's also a sign that they believed, and put their heart and soul into the game. They felt tremendously bad that they weren't successful. That's the way it's supposed to be. That was an instance, in a difficult time, that was a good sign for me."

And there could be even more adversity this season.

Outside expectations are low for Brewster's team this year because he returns the Big Ten's worst offense and another new coordinator, with a talented but young defense that could feature 11 new starters, and with a schedule that ranks as the toughest in the Big Ten and the fifth-hardest in the nation, according to Phil Steele's College Football Preview magazine and website.

"How exactly improving our team vs. the type of schedule we have equates to number of wins, I don't know," Brewster said. "But I do know this. We will continue to be an improved football team. I think, without question, we'll be a better football team than we were last year. And that's what programs need to do."

BEST STAFF, SYSTEM

Brewster has replaced eight people since assembling his original staff at Minnesota. He is on his second offensive line coach, second director of football operations, third wide receivers coach, third offensive coordinator and third defensive coordinator. But Big Ten Network analyst and former Indiana coach Gerry DiNardo said he has seen that type of turnover before with a first-time head coach who eventually had great success.

DiNardo said he witnessed 12 staff member changes in the first three seasons when he was an assistant to Colorado coach Bill McCartney in the 1980s. McCartney eventually won a national title, in his ninth season, in 1990.

Like Brewster, McCartney was a rookie coach who needed time to figure out his staff and philosophy. DiNardo said Brewster has his best staff yet, especially with veterans Kevin Cosgrove (defense) and Jeff Horton (offense) as his coordinators.

"It's just something you have to anticipate because you don't know how your staff is going to mesh," DiNardo said. "You don't know how the coordinators are going to respond to the head coach's leadership. This isn't that unusual. It's the same thing with the change in systems. What made it really unique in Minnesota's case is that Tim wasn't an offensive or defensive coordinator, so he didn't necessarily bring a system with him."

For the first time in his tenure, Brewster welcomes back the same defensive coordinator for a second straight season, after losing Everett Withers and then Ted Roof before hiring Cosgrove last season.

The defense was more complex at first under Withers, a former NFL assistant. But the attacking style that struggled under Withers made a turnaround under Roof with simpler schemes. Cosgrove had a more conservative approach, but he also kept things simple to allow players to do less thinking and more reacting on the field.

The offense also went through an evolution, starting with a wide-open spread attack under veteran Mike Dunbar for two years. Then came a mix of the spread and pro style under then-32-year-old Jedd Fisch last season, but that offense was even less effective, partly because Fisch had no experience as a coordinator.

Simple is also what the offense is trying to be now, with a run-oriented, pro-style system under former Wisconsin and Detroit Lions quarterbacks coach Horton, who joined the Gophers after Fisch left to be the Seattle Seahawks' quarterbacks coach.

"I think (the offense) reflects his personality and what I think he believes needs to be done at Minnesota," Maturi said about Brewster.

Well, sort of. Brewster's personality has appeared different from when he was hired three years ago. He's more often calm and reserved. He's not constantly in your face with his lofty expectations.

Brewster arrived with an over-the-top, high-energy bravado and an offense to match that was supposed to excite the fan base and bring in top recruits at every position.

Maturi said his coach has grown, because his overall plan now is simpler.

"Quite frankly, I agree with it," Maturi said. "I think you need to run the ball at Minnesota. I think you need to play solid defense in the Big Ten. I think that's his mind-set. I think he's recruited to that mind-set. I think that's the direction we're headed."

BEST TALENT

Brewster had a chance to make a big statement this year, to validate his reputation as a super recruiter from his days as a Texas assistant, if he could have landed the nation's top recruit, Cretin Derham-Hall offensive tackle Seantrel Henderson.

It didn't happen.

In fact, his staff broke a minor NCAA rule in the recruitment process, the second time in as many tries that Brewster has struck out with an elite local player. First was former Cretin Derham-Hall and current Notre Dame receiver Michael Floyd.

But Brewster has done better than Mason in landing a majority of the state's top high school players. He's also done a better job recruiting nationally, especially on defense.

And now those players are in significant roles.

Nine defensive starters are gone, and there could be an entirely new starting defense this season. Senior safeties Kim Royston (leg) and Kyle Theret (suspension) would be the only returning starters, but they're iffy for Middle Tennessee State.

The Gophers had five defensive starters last year who were rated at fewer than three stars by Rivals.com or Scout.com out of high school. But all of Minnesota's defensive starters this season likely will have been at least three-star recruits, including three former four-star players.

"He's done really well in-state (overall), and the high school coaches seem to really like him," CBS College Sports recruiting expert Tom Lemming said. "The same thing happened at Wisconsin and Iowa; their recruiting was good, not great, until they got to the top. It takes awhile to build up, but what you do is do good evaluating, picking guys and just good recruiting like Brewster. He's an incisive recruiter to the point he's probably not sleeping."

Senior cornerback Ryan Collado likely will be the only starter on Minnesota's defense for the opener who wasn't recruited by Brewster and his staff. Brewster is expected to start two freshmen (safety James Manuel and defensive end Ra'Shede Hageman) and four sophomores.

So that lack of experience calls for patience.

"It's a lot easier when you have good talent to mold," Cosgrove said. "We're very fortunate that way. But we just have to keep on coming. It's still a work in progress."

On offense, five of Brewster's probable starters for the opener were recruited by Mason, including senior quarterback Adam Weber and junior tailback Duane Bennett. Those players could be a better match to Horton's offense.

Another key factor is the impact of former four-star quarterback and All-American MarQueis Gray, now a sophomore. He's the best offensive recruit Brewster has brought to Minnesota. Gray is Weber's backup for now, but he is expected to have a larger role in the offense than last year, even if it's at receiver.

"When you look at your team and who your explosive players are, MarQueis is definitely one of them," Horton said. "It's up to us to figure out a way to get him on the field enough in different ways where it's fair to him and helps us win."

BEST SEASON? NOT LIKELY

Even though Brewster says this is his best team, the record likely won't indicate that. This could be the program's toughest schedule in almost two decades.

Of course, the schedule seemed brutal entering last season, too, and turned out to be mediocre at best. This time, though, the schedule has a better chance to match the hype.

Based on preseason rankings, Minnesota could end up playing five ranked opponents. That hasn't happened since coach John Gutekunst played six ranked teams and went 2-9 in his last season of 1991. Before that, Joe Salem played five ranked teams in his last season, going 1-11 in 1983.

The Gophers play at Wisconsin this year, but four of the games against other currently ranked opponents (Southern Cal, Ohio State, Penn State and Iowa) will be at TCF Bank Stadium. If those teams are all still ranked when they play here, it will be the first time the program hosted four ranked teams.

"I know it sounds good for the fans to see all of these great teams, but I would take my (easier) games at home when I'm building a program," DiNardo said. "When you're challenging for the championship, then this is a nice schedule. I don't think that's where Minnesota is right now."

Although the Gophers are expected to fall off this year, Brewster had rebuilt the program to the middle of the Big Ten and midlevel bowls the previous two years — the same place it was in Mason's last few years.

So when does the program take the next step?

"Our goals haven't changed," Brewster said. "Our goal is to win a Big Ten championship. We're going to win a Big Ten championship. I truly believe that. When exactly is that going to happen? It's when our players are ready to go do that."

Former Gophers All-American and influential booster Bob McNamara said progress is being made. He expects the offense to improve, even without former All-Big Ten receiver Eric Decker, now with the Denver Broncos.

McNamara predicts another bowl season for Brewster. But if that doesn't happen, and the Gophers really struggle, McNamara said, changing coaches isn't the answer.

McNamara said Brewster's staff, system and recruiting point toward the program making a jump sooner rather than later. But it's possible next year's schedule could be tough, as well, especially if Nebraska ends up in the Gophers' division as the Big Ten expands to 12 teams.

"You've got to give the guy a chance," McNamara said. "I know darn well he's done a good job recruiting — better kids and better athletes. But unfortunately, it takes time. Everyone wants instant success. But that's not going to happen."

Go Gophers!!
 

Regarding the coaching turnover I think Brewster made some mistakes when he first game in. But when you hire a coach with no head coaching experience those are the risks you take. You have to expect some "on the job training". Hopefully Brewster learned his lesson and has all the right pieces in place.
 

They don't just want a .350 hitter at the plate.

Umm...I would love a .350 hitter. I realize he says we want a home run hitter...but I'll take a guy who hits .350 any day over a .225 slugger.
 

Eker... I think the problem is Brew hasn't hit .350 yet. Right now he's batting .275 with a low slugging percentage just like Glen Mason.
 



From the tone of this piece by Marcus, it sounds as though no matter how badly this year or the next few years may go that the AD, a McNamara, a tv analyst and a national recruiting analyst think that the coach will be leading this program. It seems as though we are forever doomed to less than exciting results for at least the first five years at the new stadium or even longer. We are where we were, only without border battle wins, trophy wins or any wins over the big boys in the conference. Personally, I found the loss to Iowa State almost as discouraging as the loss to Texas Tech (they had given Oklahoma and Texas fits that year.) I was horribly discouraged after that Iowa State loss. Oh well. I just hope we can some day beat Iowa or Wisconsin or both in the same year. It is a little less than exciting thinking about that, so I guess I'll just try not to think about it. I will treasure any Big Ten wins we can be lucky enough to get. It's pretty hard to get too excited about South Dakota, Middle Tennessee State or Northern Illinois. I will have to live for any Big Ten win we can beg, borrow or steal. The coach is under contract through the end of the 2013 season. Tonight, that seems like a long time from now.
 

Eker... I think the problem is Brew hasn't hit .350 yet. Right now he's batting .275 with a low slugging percentage just like Glen Mason.

How is he like Mason? I thought this coach has not won any rivalry games (0-9). I thought that other coach took over a program that had only won three Big Ten games in three years and led that team to a 5-3 Big Ten season in his third year. I remember beating Oregon, Alabama and Arkansas in bowl games. I remember us winning fifteen of our last thirty two Big Ten games under that coach. Now some here are saying it will be "good enough" if this coach wins eight (8!!!!) BT games of his first thirty two. How is that "just like" Glen Mason? Perhaps someday this coach will lead us to the Big Ten championship, but thus far he is six out of twenty four with no wins in eleven trophy tries.:confused:
 

Umm...I would love a .350 hitter. I realize he says we want a home run hitter...but I'll take a guy who hits .350 any day over a .225 slugger.

Our current coach is a .250 hitter. He has won 6 of the 24 Big Ten games he has coached, none in trophy games.
 

How is he like Mason? I thought this coach has not won any rivalry games (0-9). I thought that other coach took over a program that had only won three Big Ten games in three years and led that team to a 5-3 Big Ten season in his third year. I remember beating Oregon, Alabama and Arkansas in bowl games. I remember us winning fifteen of our last thirty two Big Ten games under that coach. Now some here are saying it will be "good enough" if this coach wins eight (8!!!!) BT games of his first thirty two. How is that "just like" Glen Mason? Perhaps someday this coach will lead us to the Big Ten championship, but thus far he is six out of twenty four with no wins in eleven trophy tries.:confused:

In Mason's third year the two Big Ten teams off the schedule were a combined 12-4.

In Brewster's third year the two Big Ten teams off the schedule were a combined 2-14.

Nevermind that his best team was down 40-6 in the third quarter at Iowa in 2003. Nevermind that from 2000 to 2006 he lost seven straight road games at Iowa and Wisconsin giving up an average of 44.2 points and losing by an average of 22.7 points per game. Brewster is 0-3 in those games giving up an average of 22.6 points and losing by an average of 6.7 points.
 



How about Iowa? Which coach did better against Iowa? That 2008 last game in the dome was the most painful loss I have ever seen the Gophers suffer, and I saw the bad blow-out loss to Nebraska in Salem's last season.

We all know that Rich Rod has pretty much destroyed the Michigan team that was off our schedule last year. Some new coach will most likely bring Michigan back. That shouldn't be too tough a task. We appear to be battling Indiana in many ways for bragging rights right now though. It is always a shame to not have the opportunity to try to knock Indiana off though.
 

How is he like Mason? I thought this coach has not won any rivalry games (0-9). I thought that other coach took over a program that had only won three Big Ten games in three years and led that team to a 5-3 Big Ten season in his third year. I remember beating Oregon, Alabama and Arkansas in bowl games. I remember us winning fifteen of our last thirty two Big Ten games under that coach. Now some here are saying it will be "good enough" if this coach wins eight (8!!!!) BT games of his first thirty two. How is that "just like" Glen Mason? Perhaps someday this coach will lead us to the Big Ten championship, but thus far he is six out of twenty four with no wins in eleven trophy tries.:confused:

brew is nothing like mason that's why i like him. brew can recruit in minnesota and everywhere else. mason was able to recruit the third tier kids from ohio and then the remaining kids from minnesota that didnt have scholly's. mason was able to rush for a million yards against god awful competition which really skewed his "legendary" rushing totals.

guys like you are a joke! glen mason would still be here if he could coach defense and if he could recruit anyone from minnesota. wayzata would have scored 40 on the gophers on yearly basis!

last, if glen mason was a good coach he would be coaching! mason isnt coaching because he sucked at it!
 

Thank you for setting me straight. Once again I thought the object of the game was to win games, not lose games close. That coach won 11 rivalry games, this has won none. If you want to compare this coach to the previous coach as being somehow "just like" you are going to need to wait until this coach gets his winning Big Ten average up to 3.4 wins per season from the 2.0 he is at now. You might also want to average 1.1 rivalry wins per season instead of 0.0. Indeed, you might want to beat any of the current big five of OSU, PSU, Mich, Wisconsin or Iowa, home or away by any margin whatsoever. After all, we do have TCF now and that does not make it harder now than it was back then.
 

In rides Loon to save the day, defend Glen Mason, and hijack a thread.

Some things never change. :rolleyes:
 




Eker... I think the problem is Brew hasn't hit .350 yet. Right now he's batting .275 with a low slugging percentage just like Glen Mason.

Careful with the Mason reference...it's so easy to start people down that road!

He's got to step up to the plate. The reason they did that is to say we're not happy with just getting to a bowl. We want to get this thing to the next level. They don't just want a .350 hitter at the plate. They want a guy who is going to knock the ball out of the park

I merely raised my eyebrows at the fact that he seems to think getting to a bowl is equivalent to hitting .350. Hitting .350 wins you a batting title. Going to a bowl is what you get when you win half your games. They should not be seen as equivalent...but I'm quibbling.

I would say Brewster is hitting about .265 right now and he needs to show something else in his game (fantastic fielding or some power) for us to leave him in the lineup, if we are to continue the analogy.

I think this was a very well written and fair article by Marcus and it would be foolish to fire Brewster after this year, unless the team appears to give up on him. Next year should be the make or break season, IMHO.
 

why is there discussion about the coach now. lets get the season in and evaluate after the season is over. Support what is going on.
 



1. Why are Wren and Loon both back on this board?

2. Mason was HORRIBLE in "border battle" games. He set a record by losing to Iowa 5 times in a row and frequently was blown out (espeically on the road) in border battle games. The worst was that we lost several key games during Mason's tenure where we were favored in "border battle" games. These losses (especially 03 to Iowa) were double punches in the gut because they were a loss to a rival and prevented a better bowl game. Brewster deserves crap for his record in rivalry games too, but to act like it was better under Mason is ridiculous.
 

Well written and fair. I liked it.

+19

Also; from Charlie Walters column today.


Football's all-time winning coach, John Gagliardi of St. John's, asked what career he would have pursued if not coaching: "One thing I've thought about my whole life is what it would be like to sit up in the stands and know all the answers like all the experts up there.

"I don't know what happens when you sit up there, but you've got all the knowledge in the world. One flash and you know what happened. I have to look at a play about 15 times on video to see what happened. And they can see it in one sweep.

"It must be wonderful up there; there must be some magic there because they know everything."
 

Eker... I think the problem is Brew hasn't hit .350 yet. Right now he's batting .275 with a low slugging percentage just like Glen Mason.

Hey Jake, did you notice where and by whom the thread was "hijacked"? Let's just stick to hoping this particular coach does very well this year and wins lots of games.:clap:
 

It says alot about the program's current coach that we're saying he's better than the last guy - because he doesn't lose as badly.

i think people are missing that we're still losing.
 

I think we should just look at the record of each and every coach since Coach Bierman. Then we can accurately determine which coaches have done better than other coaches. We can also use the time frames to see which coach during that half century plus time frame played in which stadiums. We can also match each of them up wth the administrations that were in place at the time. We can also follow the string of athletic directors. We can also follow the impact that the NFL and MLB have had on our Golden Gophers from pre-Vikings & Twins to the current day. Now that would be a fair and balanced and totally inclusive look at the reality of 60 years of Golden Gopher Football. We can analyze the scores, the margins of victrory and defeat, the Big Ten standings of all of our Big Ten rivals. That way we can get to the bottom of all of this stuff. It is my opinion that more than anything, the history of the Big Ten standings will play a large role in telling us how we have fared compared to our Big Ten rivals. The history of how the Vikings and Twins arrival in the Twin Cities has impacted Golden Gopher Football as a presence in the State of Minnesota and the Twin Cities also has been a huge factor in my opinion. How the various administrations and athletic directors have viewed the football program and have either supported or not supported Gopher Football is key. Finally, the impact or lack of impact of the Twin Cities media on Gopher Football can be discussed at length. Compelling subjects, each and every one of them. They have mattered and the always will matter.

When to pull the plug on a coach and when not to pull the plug on a coach? When to fight the overwhelming resources that the NFL and MLB and NBA and NHL can use to attack all competetors for ticket sales, media attention and fan support? When to just plain give up and walk away? When to use the football program to support Title IX and non-revenue sports and just take what the Big Ten Revenue sharing plan gives our athletic director to fund all the other programs. Is it less than honest and moral to just have a football program that can never really compete for a Big Ten championship? How is Maturi doing in supporting the football program vs. the Men's basketball program and the Men's hockey program? How does a Maturi-led athletic department do in comparison to the MLB, NHL, NFL and NBA that all compete within the state of Minnesota for our dollars and affections?

Is there any purpose at all in trying to compete with the Twins and Vikings for ticket sles and media coverage? Do all sports at the University of Minnesota consume too many resources for the impact they have on the majority of the students?

Have our revenue producing sports failed badly under the current administration? Or, does it really even matter to people?
 

Thank you for setting me straight. Once again I thought the object of the game was to win games, not lose games close. That coach won 11 rivalry games, this has won none. If you want to compare this coach to the previous coach as being somehow "just like" you are going to need to wait until this coach gets his winning Big Ten average up to 3.4 wins per season from the 2.0 he is at now. You might also want to average 1.1 rivalry wins per season instead of 0.0. Indeed, you might want to beat any of the current big five of OSU, PSU, Mich, Wisconsin or Iowa, home or away by any margin whatsoever. After all, we do have TCF now and that does not make it harder now than it was back then.

you dont get it, programs arent built in 3-4 yrs after 40 yrs of failure. maybe brew could have taken the zook plan and play all the highly touted recruits right away instead of redshirting and giving the kids a couple yrs in the strength program to get them where they need to be mentally, strength wise, as well as in the classroom. when brew came in he took over a terrible roster with a bad fanbase and state that refused to recognize the program. when mason was here the only time we had 30,000+ is when iowa or wisky came into town. you seem to think we are an equal to osu, psu, wisky, etc just because we have a new stadium. it doesnt work like that. we dont have the resources of an alabama to turn around a program over night! we dont have the support that is needed to turn this program around today. its a process, you have to build depth everywhere, you have to get back to minnesota high schools to get kids excited about being a gopher whether they are student athletes or just students. kids have to dream about being a gopher, when did mason try to paint that picture? mason beat our rivals quicker than brew, sure its stressful because we all want the instant gratification but the reality is we want/need a program not a quick fix. we need coaches that want to be here, if we can keep a staff together and many like these guys, i think we will be in great shape in the future. mason is gone get over it!
 

All I learned from this Fuller piece was that he watched the Gophers Big Ten Preview show on Friday night. Nothing new here.
 




Top Bottom