Justin Cobbs and Cal

Donate To GopherHole
B

Block M

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
818
Points
113
Justin looks...disinterested. As does his team. Wow.

Perhaps Cobbs and Joseph's numbers were inflated by playing in a mid-major.
 


Devoe is legit good. I think Cobbs is alright.
 


Not a good start to the postseason for the Pac-12. Only one team makes it to the field of 64 and that's only because they were an automatic bid. Arizona lost to Bucknell at home tonight as well.
 


Block M said:
Justin looks...disinterested. As does his team. Wow.

Perhaps Cobbs and Joseph's numbers were inflated by playing in a mid-major.
Click to expand...
It is true that Cobbs did not impress.
 

GophersInIowa said:
Not a good start to the postseason for the Pac-12. Only one team makes it to the field of 64 and that's only because they were an automatic bid. Arizona lost to Bucknell at home tonight as well.
Click to expand...
I like that Colorado team though. They have solid players.
 

GophersInIowa said:
Not a good start to the postseason for the Pac-12. Only one team makes it to the field of 64 and that's only because they were an automatic bid. Arizona lost to Bucknell at home tonight as well.
Click to expand...

But someone (not you) said I was into "conspiracy" theories when I said that the B1G was underrated with respect to the NIT (and mentioned the mainly Southern affiliations of who was on the BOD of the NIT). Arizona losing to Bucknell at home in the #1/8 game indicates that the Pac-12 was overrated. The 3 Big Ten teams all won in the first round in even-seed or worse matches, including an away game. We'll see what Iowa does at Oregon.
 

GophersInIowa said:
Not a good start to the postseason for the Pac-12. Only one team makes it to the field of 64 and that's only because they were an automatic bid. Arizona lost to Bucknell at home tonight as well.
Click to expand...

The SEC from a few years back was pretty awful. Can the 2011-2012 version of the Pac-12 REALLY be this bad?
 



cncmin said:
The SEC from a few years back was pretty awful. Can the 2011-2012 version of the Pac-12 REALLY be this bad?
Click to expand...

2009 I believe? I'd say the SEC was better. They at least put 3 teams in the tourney and LSU advanced to the field of 32. Having just two teams in the tournament is bad enough, but having your highest seed be #11 is downright brutal.
 

As lame as the PAC-12 has been this year, I still expected way better from Cal. They laid a major egg.
 

Bad Gopher said:
As lame as the PAC-12 has been this year, I still expected way better from Cal. They laid a major egg.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
 

X 2.

I thought Cal was capable of winning a game or 2. Disappointing. Look like they barely cared, which surprised me considering who their coach is.

Another rough night for the Pac 12. Commissioner Scott really needs a win out of Colorado tonight to at least save some face.
 



You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom